Literature DB >> 23412239

Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with LARS artificial ligament.

S Giannotti1, G Dell'osso, G Bugelli, N Cazzella, G Guido.   

Abstract

The choice of the most appropriate procedure for surgical treatment of type IV-V and VI dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint according to Rockwood's classification has always been troublesome because of complications such as residual instability of the joint, delayed arthrosis of the A-C, delayed osteolysis of the clavicle, host intolerance towards artificial ligaments and because of the need of early mobilization of the affected limb. In our study, 17 male patients, ranging in age from 21 to 79 years and affected by A-C dislocation grade IV and V, both acute and chronic, underwent surgical reconstruction of the A-C joint capsule and extra-articular ligaments with ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) artificial ligament. Following surgery, their affected limb was braced for 3 days and thereafter all patients began an early active and passive mobilization programme. Patients eventually all returned to their previous working and recreational activities. Throughout thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation and the use of both Constant score and Simple Shoulder test, the aim of our study is to prove that at mid-term follow-up, the reconstruction of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments with LARS is a valid and safe alternative to other procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23412239     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-1113-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  4 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro cellular ingrowth into a new generation of artificial ligaments.

Authors:  K Trieb; H Blahovec; G Brand; M Sabeti; M Dominkus; R Kotz
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.745

2.  A classification of acute acromioclavicular dislocation: a clinical, radiological and anatomical study.

Authors:  G C Bannister; W A Wallace; P G Stableforth; M A Hutson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Disruption of the acromioclavicular joint: surgical anatomy and biological reconstruction.

Authors:  S Copeland; L Kessel
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Indices of risk assessment of fracture of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Stefano Giannotti; Vanna Bottai; Giacomo Dell'osso; Daniela Donati; Giulia Bugelli; Gaia De Paola; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2012-05-29
  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Three intrasubstance failures of a LARS™ ligament used for ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  V Ramsingh; A D Yewlett; H C Pullen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes.

Authors:  Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Christopher Manning; Philip Wright; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Lennard Funk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Acromio-clavicular repair using two different techniques.

Authors:  Lorenzo Andreani; Enrico Bonicoli; Paolo Parchi; Nicola Piolanti; Lisanti Michele
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-13

4.  Clinical and radiological results after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using three different techniques. A retrospective study.

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Stefano Schiavetti; Giuseppe Battistella; Enrico Rebuzzi; Nicolò Coletti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

5.  Surgical treatment of acute and chronic AC joint dislocations: Five-year experience with conventional and modified LARS fixation by a single surgeon.

Authors:  Yassine Ochen; Reinier B Beks; Benjamin L Emmink; Philippe Wittich; Detlef van der Velde; R Marijn Houwert; Jort Keizer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-08-14

6.  Medium- to long-term results of acromioclavicular joint stabilisation using the Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS) ligament.

Authors:  Thomas Ja Hunter; Mohammed Abdus-Samee; Sivaraman Balasubramanian; Natalie Grocott; Damian McClelland
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-03-13

7.  Comparison of results between hook plate fixation and ligament reconstruction for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Jong Pil Yoon; Byoung-Joo Lee; Sang Jin Nam; Seok Won Chung; Won-Ju Jeong; Woo-Kie Min; Joo Han Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-02-10

8.  Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System Failures in Repair of Grade V Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Martin K-H Li; David Woods
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2017-09-06

9.  Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case-control study.

Authors:  You-Shui Gao; Yue-Lei Zhang; Zi-Sheng Ai; Yu-Qiang Sun; Chang-Qing Zhang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Status and headway of the clinical application of artificial ligaments.

Authors:  Tianwu Chen; Jia Jiang; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2015-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.