Literature DB >> 1587572

A classification of acute acromioclavicular dislocation: a clinical, radiological and anatomical study.

G C Bannister1, W A Wallace, P G Stableforth, M A Hutson.   

Abstract

Forty-eight patients with acute acromioclavicular dislocation were assessed clinically and radiologically before random allocation to non-operative management (28) or open reduction and coracoclavicular screw fixation (20) and followed for a minimum of 4 years. In 6 patients, late salvage surgery was required, the results of which were inferior to early operative intervention. Early surgery also gave better results than non-operative treatment in severe disruptions which could be identified in the acute stage. Three types of acromioclavicular dislocation which have predictable clinical outcomes could be distinguished on radiographs. When treated non-operatively, type A dislocations (19 per cent) may develop painful subluxation, type B (68 per cent) remain dislocated but retain sufficient muscle attachment to avoid fatigue on activity, and type C (12 per cent) leave a weak and unsightly shoulder. In type C dislocations, the clavicle is displaced 2 cm or more from the acromion on plain anteroposterior radiographs and the attached origin of the anterior deltoid is avulsed. Type C dislocations may benefit from early operative reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1587572     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(05)80044-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

Review 1.  [The acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  A Klonz; D Loitz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with LARS artificial ligament.

Authors:  S Giannotti; G Dell'osso; G Bugelli; N Cazzella; G Guido
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-30

3.  The Effects of Hook Plates on the Subacromial Space. A Clinical and MRI Study.

Authors:  Jörg Schmidt; Thorsten Altmann; Ina Schmidt; Jörg Hackenberger; Rainer Letsch
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.

Authors:  Marcel Js Tamaoki; Mário Lenza; Fabio T Matsunaga; João Carlos Belloti; Marcelo H Matsumoto; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 5.  Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guolong Tang; Yu Zhang; Yuan Liu; Xiaodong Qin; Jun Hu; Xiang Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations graded Rockwood III-V: a retrospective and comparative study between three different surgical techniques.

Authors:  Michele Fosser; Antonio Camporese
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-11-05

Review 7.  Qualitative and Quantitative Anatomic Descriptions of the Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligaments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liam A Peebles; Zachary S Aman; Matthew J Kraeutler; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 8.  Surgical Management of Acute Rockwood Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Isaac Okereke; Elsenosy Abdelfatah
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.