Literature DB >> 15178903

In vivo and in vitro cellular ingrowth into a new generation of artificial ligaments.

K Trieb1, H Blahovec, G Brand, M Sabeti, M Dominkus, R Kotz.   

Abstract

Artificial ligaments are a useful tool in ligament reconstruction. Although the new generation of artificial ligaments shows encouraging clinical results, in contrast to earlier generations studies on the biological properties are lacking. Biopsies were taken from a ligament advancement reinforcement system (LARS) 6 months after implantation and investigated by histochemistry. An in vitro study seeding human fibroblasts or osteoblast-like cells (up to 10(6) cells for 21 days) on ligament pieces (5 x 5 mm) was conducted and analyzed by histochemistry. The biopsies showed complete cellular and connective tissue ingrowth in the LARS ligament. In vitro fibroblasts and osteoblast-like cells encapsulated the fibers by building a cellular net around them. To our knowledge, these findings demonstrate for the first time the cellular ingrowth into the LARS ligament. This mechanism might explain the strength and the inert behavior of the ligament without the synovialitis shown in clinical studies. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15178903     DOI: 10.1159/000077256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Surg Res        ISSN: 0014-312X            Impact factor:   1.745


  36 in total

1.  [Functional tendon repair in orthopedic tumor surgery].

Authors:  M Dominkus; M Sabeti; R Kotz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhong-tang Liu; Xian-long Zhang; Yao Jiang; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS™ artificial ligament results at a mean follow-up of eight years.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Ciapini Gianluca; Lorenzo Dolfi; Alessandro Baluganti; Piolanti Nicola; Fabio Chiellini; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Pierorazio Motta; Laura Bruno; Alberto Maderni; Piermario Tosco; Umberto Mariotti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Histological characteristics and ultrastructure of polyethylene terephthalate LARS ligament after the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament in rabbits.

Authors:  Shao-Bin Yu; Rong-Hua Yang; Zhong-Nan Zuo; Qi-Rong Dong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  Three intrasubstance failures of a LARS™ ligament used for ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  V Ramsingh; A D Yewlett; H C Pullen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Cadaveric scapholunate reconstruction using the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system.

Authors:  Kevin Eng; Michael Wagels; Stephen K Tham
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2014-08

8.  [Proximal tibial reconstruction with gastrocnemius flap].

Authors:  K Trieb; M Göggel; H-R Dürr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with the LARS ligament in professional versus non-professional athletes.

Authors:  Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Christopher Manning; Philip Wright; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Lennard Funk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  [Proximal tibial replacement and alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after bone tumor resection].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; H Pilge; A Toepfer; R G Jakubietz; H Gollwitzer; H Rechl; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; M Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.