Ken R Smith1, Heidi A Hanson, Michael S Hollingshaus. 1. Department of Family and Consumer Studies, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, USA. ken.smith@fcs.utah.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent publications examining BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and their relationship with female fertility. RECENT FINDINGS: Eight relevant studies of female fertility, five of which were published since January 2010 and the remainder in the preceding decade. Several mechanisms suggest that reproduction will be adversely affected among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with one study finding lower oocyte production, another reporting fewer births, and a third showing lower rates of pregnancies. Four articles reported no significant difference in the number of children ever born between carriers and noncarriers whereas a 2012 study showed elevated natural fertility among mutation carriers. SUMMARY: This review shows that for most articles there are adverse or no fertility effects of being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier. When no differences were detected for children-ever-born, those studies relied on current populations in which women had access to contraception. The sole analysis reporting elevated fertility was based on an historic population in which family planning methods were unavailable. Predictions that BRCA1/2 mutations adversely affect embryogenesis and genome integrity were not supported. The idea that BRCA1/2 mutations have antagonistic pleiotropic effects (enhancing fertility while reducing survival) was supported in the natural fertility study.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent publications examining BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and their relationship with female fertility. RECENT FINDINGS: Eight relevant studies of female fertility, five of which were published since January 2010 and the remainder in the preceding decade. Several mechanisms suggest that reproduction will be adversely affected among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with one study finding lower oocyte production, another reporting fewer births, and a third showing lower rates of pregnancies. Four articles reported no significant difference in the number of children ever born between carriers and noncarriers whereas a 2012 study showed elevated natural fertility among mutation carriers. SUMMARY: This review shows that for most articles there are adverse or no fertility effects of being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier. When no differences were detected for children-ever-born, those studies relied on current populations in which women had access to contraception. The sole analysis reporting elevated fertility was based on an historic population in which family planning methods were unavailable. Predictions that BRCA1/2 mutations adversely affect embryogenesis and genome integrity were not supported. The idea that BRCA1/2 mutations have antagonistic pleiotropic effects (enhancing fertility while reducing survival) was supported in the natural fertility study.
Authors: Eitan Friedman; Joanne Kotsopoulos; Jan Lubinski; Henry T Lynch; Parviz Ghadirian; Susan L Neuhausen; Claudine Isaacs; Barbara Weber; William D Foulkes; Pal Moller; Barry Rosen; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Peter Ainsworth; Mary Daly; Nadine Tung; Andrea Eisen; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Beth Karlan; Howard M Saal; Judy E Garber; Gad Rennert; Dawna Gilchrist; Charis Eng; Kenneth Offit; Michael Osborne; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-21 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Courtney W Hanna; Karla L Bretherick; Jane L Gair; Margo R Fluker; Mary D Stephenson; Wendy P Robinson Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2009-02-06 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Eva Seemanova; Raymonda Varon; Jan Vejvalka; Petr Jarolim; Pavel Seeman; Krystyna H Chrzanowska; Martin Digweed; Igor Resnick; Ivo Kremensky; Kathrin Saar; Katrin Hoffmann; Véronique Dutrannoy; Mohsen Karbasiyan; Mehdi Ghani; Ivo Barić; Mustafa Tekin; Peter Kovacs; Michael Krawczak; André Reis; Karl Sperling; Michael Nothnagel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yilong Miao; Pan Wang; Bingteng Xie; Mo Yang; Sen Li; Zhaokang Cui; Yong Fan; Mo Li; Bo Xiong Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: K Morarji; O McArdle; K Hui; G Gingras-Hill; S Ahmed; E M Greenblatt; E Warner; S Sridhar; A M F Ali; A Azad; D C Hodgson Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 3.677