| Literature DB >> 19202142 |
Courtney W Hanna1, Karla L Bretherick, Jane L Gair, Margo R Fluker, Mary D Stephenson, Wendy P Robinson.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rate of reproductive aging may be related to rate of biological aging. Thus, indicators of aging, such as short telomere length, may be more frequent in women with a history suggestive of premature reproductive senescence.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19202142 PMCID: PMC2667790 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod ISSN: 0268-1161 Impact factor: 6.918
Rate of telomere loss per year in women with evidence of premature reproductive aging and controls
| Sample group | N | Age range (years) | Rate of telomere decline (base pairs/year) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | |||||
| Control group 1 | 108 | 17–55 | −40 | −66 | −14 | 0.081 | 0.001 |
| Control group 2 | 46 | 37–54 | 26 | −56 | 107 | 0.009 | 0.26 |
| POF patients | 34 | 21–50 | −98 | −178 | −17 | 0.161 | 0.01 |
| RM | 95 | 24–45 | −3 | −40 | 40 | 0.000 | 0.44 |
| Single trisomy | 32 | 24–44 | −56 | −110 | −2 | 0.130 | 0.02 |
| Multiple trisomy | 17 | 33–44 | −23 | −150 | 105 | 0.010 | 0.35 |
CI, confidence interval; POF, premature ovarian failure; Control group 1, women from the general population; Control group 2, women who had a healthy pregnancy after 37 years of age.
aR2 is a measure of the goodness of fit of the regression.
bP-values are based on a one-tailed test for significance of the regression based on the t-distribution.
Raw and age-adjusted mean telomere length
| Sample group | Mean age (years) | Mean telomere length | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw data (±SD) (kb) | Age-adjusted (kb) | ||||
| Control group 1 | 108 | 36.3 | 8.98 ± 1.15 | 8.92 | |
| Control group 2 | 46 | 41.5 | 8.99 ± 1.03 | 9.11 | 0.36 |
| POF patients | 34 | 35.4 | 9.61 ± 1.38 | 9.58 | 0.01, 0.32 |
| RM | 95 | 35.8 | 8.47 ± 0.92 | 8.46 | 0.0004, 0.02 |
| Single trisomy | 32 | 36.3 | 8.80 ± 0.78 | 8.80 | 0.39, 0.26 |
| Multiple trisomy | 17 | 39.3 | 8.42 ± 0.69 | 8.52 | 0.11, 0.06 |
aP-values in comparison with Control groups 1 and 2, respectively.
bAnalysis of covariance (k = 2 in comparison with Control group 1 or 2) was used to adjust raw telomere length data by age in comparisons between groups.