Literature DB >> 23411387

Using the science of psychosocial care to implement the new american college of surgeons commission on cancer distress screening standard.

Lynne I Wagner1, David Spiegel, Timothy Pearman.   

Abstract

The American College of Surgeons (ACoS) Commission on Cancer (CoC) has advanced a new patient-centered accreditation standard requiring programs to implement psychosocial distress screening and referral for psychosocial care. The field of psychosocial oncology has advocated for routine distress screening as an integral component of quality cancer care since the NCCN Distress Management Panel first recommended this practice in 1999. Accreditation standards have a significant impact on practice patterns and quality of care. The new ACoS CoC Psychosocial Distress Screening Standard provides a unique opportunity to integrate the science of psychosocial care into clinical practice. National organizations, including the American Psychosocial Oncology Society, the Association of Oncology Social Work, the Cancer Support Community, and LIVESTRONG, can offer valuable guidance and resources. This article reviews ACoS CoC requirements, highlighting key research findings and providing practical considerations to guide programs with implementation. Although screening for distress encompasses many domains, this article reviews the evidence linking depression-one aspect of distress-and cancer outcomes to highlight the profound influence psychosocial care delivery can have on promoting medical outcomes and quality cancer survivorship. The authors describe distress screening program accomplishments at Northwestern University, including the electronic administration of NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computerized adaptive testing item banks. Electronic medical record integration facilitates real-time scoring, interpretation, provider notification, and triage for psychosocial care. Roughly one-third of patients have requested assistance with psychosocial needs. As ACoS CoC programs implement psychosocial distress screening and management, the emerging field of implementation science can guide future clinical program developments and research priorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23411387     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  30 in total

1.  Prevalence of physical problems detected by the distress thermometer and problem list in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarland; Kelly M Shaffer; Amy Tiersten; Jimmie Holland
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  The five steps of comprehensive psychosocial distress screening.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Hui Tan; Nick Pasacreta; Elizabeth Ercolano; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Nan E Rothrock; Esi M DeWitt; Brennan Spiegel; Carole A Tucker; Heidi M Crane; Christopher B Forrest; Donald L Patrick; Rob Fredericksen; Lisa M Shulman; David Cella; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Supporting commission on cancer-mandated psychosocial distress screening with implementation strategies.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Elizabeth Ercolano; Marcia Grant; Jimmie C Holland; Paul B Jacobsen; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Gaps in the Management of Depression Symptoms Following Cancer Diagnosis: A Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Laura E Davis; Elie Isenberg-Grzeda; Alyson L Mahar; Haoyu Zhao; Victoria Zuk; Lesley Moody; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-02-26

6.  Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Randomized Trial of a Social Networking Intervention for Cancer-Related Distress.

Authors:  Jason E Owen; Erin O'Carroll Bantum; Ian S Pagano; Annette Stanton
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-10

Review 8.  Physical and mental health among cancer survivors: considerations for long-term care and quality of life.

Authors:  Michelle J Naughton; Kathryn E Weaver
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

9.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10): A patient-reported psychosocial survey for quality cancer care.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Benjamin P Chapman; Supriya G Mohile; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2016-09

10.  Patterns and predictors of antidepressant use in ambulatory cancer patients with common solid tumors.

Authors:  Michael J Fisch; Fengmin Zhao; Judith Manola; Andrew H Miller; William F Pirl; Lynne I Wagner
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.