Mark Lazenby1, Elizabeth Ercolano2, Marcia Grant2, Jimmie C Holland2, Paul B Jacobsen2, Ruth McCorkle2. 1. Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, CT; City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL mark.lazenby@yale.edu. 2. Yale University School of Nursing, New Haven, CT; City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) has set psychosocial distress screening as a new patient care standard to be met by 2015. The standard requires CoC-accredited cancer centers to integrate and monitor distress screening and, when needed, refer patients to psychosocial health care services. We describe the uptake of distress screening reported by applicants to a distress screening cancer education program and the degree of and barriers to implementation of distress screening programs reported by selected participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study collected quantitative data online from applicants to the program between August 1 and November 15, 2013, described by frequencies, percentages, and measures of central tendency, and qualitative data in person from accepted participants on February 13, 2014, analyzed using an integrated approach to open-ended data. RESULTS: Applications were received from 70 institutions, 29 of which had started distress screening. Seven of 18 selected applicant institutions had not begun screening patients for distress. Analysis of qualitative data showed that all participants needed to create buy-in among key cancer center staff, including oncologists; to decide how to conduct screening in their institution in a way that complied with the standard; and to pilot test screening before large-scale rollout. CONCLUSION: Fourteen months before the compliance deadline, fewer than half of applicant institutions had begun distress screening. Adding implementation strategies to mandated quality care standards may reduce uncertainty about how to comply. Support from key staff members such as oncologists may increase uptake of distress screening.
PURPOSE: The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) has set psychosocial distress screening as a new patient care standard to be met by 2015. The standard requires CoC-accredited cancer centers to integrate and monitor distress screening and, when needed, refer patients to psychosocial health care services. We describe the uptake of distress screening reported by applicants to a distress screening cancer education program and the degree of and barriers to implementation of distress screening programs reported by selected participants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study collected quantitative data online from applicants to the program between August 1 and November 15, 2013, described by frequencies, percentages, and measures of central tendency, and qualitative data in person from accepted participants on February 13, 2014, analyzed using an integrated approach to open-ended data. RESULTS: Applications were received from 70 institutions, 29 of which had started distress screening. Seven of 18 selected applicant institutions had not begun screening patients for distress. Analysis of qualitative data showed that all participants needed to create buy-in among key cancer center staff, including oncologists; to decide how to conduct screening in their institution in a way that complied with the standard; and to pilot test screening before large-scale rollout. CONCLUSION: Fourteen months before the compliance deadline, fewer than half of applicant institutions had begun distress screening. Adding implementation strategies to mandated quality care standards may reduce uncertainty about how to comply. Support from key staff members such as oncologists may increase uptake of distress screening.
Authors: William F Pirl; Jesse R Fann; Joseph A Greer; Ilana Braun; Teresa Deshields; Caryl Fulcher; Elizabeth Harvey; Jimmie Holland; Vicki Kennedy; Mark Lazenby; Lynne Wagner; Meghan Underhill; Deborah K Walker; James Zabora; Bradley Zebrack; Wayne A Bardwell Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Devon K Check; Marilyn L Kwan; Neetu Chawla; Stacie B Dusetzina; Emily Valice; Isaac J Ergas; Janise M Roh; Tatjana Kolevska; Donald L Rosenstein; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Andrea K Knies; Devika R Jutagir; Elizabeth Ercolano; Nicholas Pasacreta; Mark Lazenby; Ruth McCorkle Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2018-06-08
Authors: Jai N Patel; Danielle Boselli; Elizabeth J Jandrisevits; Issam S Hamadeh; Ahmed Salem; Patrick Meadors; Declan Walsh Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kerrie Clover; Sylvie D Lambert; Christopher Oldmeadow; Benjamin Britton; Madeleine T King; Alex J Mitchell; Gregory Carter Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Christine B Weldon; Sarah M Friedewald; Swati A Kulkarni; Melissa A Simon; Ruth C Carlos; Jonathan B Strauss; Mikele M Bunce; Art Small; Julia R Trosman Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Daniel C McFarland; Kelly M Shaffer; Heather Polizzi; John Mascarenhas; Marina Kremyanskaya; Jimmie Holland; Ronald Hoffman Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Mark Lazenby; Elizabeth Ercolano; Andrea Knies; Nick Pasacreta; Marcia Grant; Jimmie C Holland; Paul B Jacobsen; Terry Badger; Devika R Jutagir; Ruth McCorkle Journal: Clin J Oncol Nurs Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 1.027
Authors: Donald R Sullivan; Christopher W Forsberg; Linda Ganzini; David H Au; Michael K Gould; Dawn Provenzale; Christopher G Slatore Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544