Literature DB >> 23410972

Integrative genomic analyses reveal an androgen-driven somatic alteration landscape in early-onset prostate cancer.

Joachim Weischenfeldt1, Ronald Simon, Lars Feuerbach, Karin Schlangen, Dieter Weichenhan, Sarah Minner, Daniela Wuttig, Hans-Jörg Warnatz, Henning Stehr, Tobias Rausch, Natalie Jäger, Lei Gu, Olga Bogatyrova, Adrian M Stütz, Rainer Claus, Jürgen Eils, Roland Eils, Clarissa Gerhäuser, Po-Hsien Huang, Barbara Hutter, Rolf Kabbe, Christian Lawerenz, Sylwester Radomski, Cynthia C Bartholomae, Maria Fälth, Stephan Gade, Manfred Schmidt, Nina Amschler, Thomas Haß, Rami Galal, Jovisa Gjoni, Ruprecht Kuner, Constance Baer, Sawinee Masser, Christof von Kalle, Thomas Zichner, Vladimir Benes, Benjamin Raeder, Malte Mader, Vyacheslav Amstislavskiy, Meryem Avci, Hans Lehrach, Dmitri Parkhomchuk, Marc Sultan, Lia Burkhardt, Markus Graefen, Hartwig Huland, Martina Kluth, Antje Krohn, Hüseyin Sirma, Laura Stumm, Stefan Steurer, Katharina Grupp, Holger Sültmann, Guido Sauter, Christoph Plass, Benedikt Brors, Marie-Laure Yaspo, Jan O Korbel, Thorsten Schlomm.   

Abstract

Early-onset prostate cancer (EO-PCA) represents the earliest clinical manifestation of prostate cancer. To compare the genomic alteration landscapes of EO-PCA with "classical" (elderly-onset) PCA, we performed deep sequencing-based genomics analyses in 11 tumors diagnosed at young age, and pursued comparative assessments with seven elderly-onset PCA genomes. Remarkable age-related differences in structural rearrangement (SR) formation became evident, suggesting distinct disease pathomechanisms. Whereas EO-PCAs harbored a prevalence of balanced SRs, with a specific abundance of androgen-regulated ETS gene fusions including TMPRSS2:ERG, elderly-onset PCAs displayed primarily non-androgen-associated SRs. Data from a validation cohort of > 10,000 patients showed age-dependent androgen receptor levels and a prevalence of SRs affecting androgen-regulated genes, further substantiating the activity of a characteristic "androgen-type" pathomechanism in EO-PCA.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23410972     DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cell        ISSN: 1535-6108            Impact factor:   31.743


  136 in total

Review 1.  Genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher E Barbieri; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusions in Prostate Cancer of West African Men and a Meta-Analysis of Racial Differences.

Authors:  Cindy Ke Zhou; Denise Young; Edward D Yeboah; Sally B Coburn; Yao Tettey; Richard B Biritwum; Andrew A Adjei; Evelyn Tay; Shelley Niwa; Ann Truelove; Judith Welsh; James E Mensah; Robert N Hoover; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Ann W Hsing; Shiv Srivastava; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  The mutational landscape of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher E Barbieri; Chris H Bangma; Anders Bjartell; James W F Catto; Zoran Culig; Henrik Grönberg; Jun Luo; Tapio Visakorpi; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  [Novel preclinical models and biomarkers for prostate cancer].

Authors:  N Korzeniewski; M Tapia-Laliena; Y Tolstov; S Pahernik; B Hadaschik; M Hohenfellner; S Duensing
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Biologic and clinical significance of androgen receptor variants in castration resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ware; Mariano A Garcia-Blanco; Andrew J Armstrong; Scott M Dehm
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 6.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

7.  Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul C Boutros; Michael Fraser; Nicholas J Harding; Richard de Borja; Dominique Trudel; Emilie Lalonde; Alice Meng; Pablo H Hennings-Yeomans; Andrew McPherson; Veronica Y Sabelnykova; Amin Zia; Natalie S Fox; Julie Livingstone; Yu-Jia Shiah; Jianxin Wang; Timothy A Beck; Cherry L Have; Taryne Chong; Michelle Sam; Jeremy Johns; Lee Timms; Nicholas Buchner; Ada Wong; John D Watson; Trent T Simmons; Christine P'ng; Gaetano Zafarana; Francis Nguyen; Xuemei Luo; Kenneth C Chu; Stephenie D Prokopec; Jenna Sykes; Alan Dal Pra; Alejandro Berlin; Andrew Brown; Michelle A Chan-Seng-Yue; Fouad Yousif; Robert E Denroche; Lauren C Chong; Gregory M Chen; Esther Jung; Clement Fung; Maud H W Starmans; Hanbo Chen; Shaylan K Govind; James Hawley; Alister D'Costa; Melania Pintilie; Daryl Waggott; Faraz Hach; Philippe Lambin; Lakshmi B Muthuswamy; Colin Cooper; Rosalind Eeles; David Neal; Bernard Tetu; Cenk Sahinalp; Lincoln D Stein; Neil Fleshner; Sohrab P Shah; Colin C Collins; Thomas J Hudson; John D McPherson; Theodorus van der Kwast; Robert G Bristow
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 8.  Maintaining and reprogramming genomic androgen receptor activity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian G Mills
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  Rationale for the development of alternative forms of androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Sangeeta Kumari; Dhirodatta Senapati; Hannelore V Heemers
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 10.  Constitutive activity of the androgen receptor.

Authors:  Siu Chiu Chan; Scott M Dehm
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.