Literature DB >> 23409839

Design and estimation for evaluating principal surrogate markers in vaccine trials.

Ying Huang1, Peter B Gilbert, Julian Wolfson.   

Abstract

In vaccine research, immune biomarkers that can reliably predict a vaccine's effect on the clinical endpoint (i.e., surrogate markers) are important tools for guiding vaccine development. This article addresses issues on optimizing two-phase sampling study design for evaluating surrogate markers in a principal surrogate framework, motivated by the design of a future HIV vaccine trial. To address the problem of missing potential outcomes in a standard trial design, novel trial designs have been proposed that utilize baseline predictors of the immune response biomarker(s) and/or augment the trial by vaccinating uninfected placebo recipients at the end of the trial and measuring their immune biomarkers. However, inefficient use of the augmented information can lead to counter-intuitive results on the precision of estimation. To remedy this problem, we propose a pseudo-score type estimator suitable for the augmented design and characterize its asymptotic properties. This estimator has superior performance compared with existing estimators and allows calculation of analytical variances useful for guiding study design. Based on the new estimator we investigate in detail the problem of optimizing the sampling scheme of a biomarker in a vaccine efficacy trial for efficiently estimating its surrogate effect, as characterized by the vaccine efficacy curve (a causal effect predictiveness curve) and by the predicted overall vaccine efficacy using the biomarker.
© 2013, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23409839      PMCID: PMC3713795          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

1.  Principal stratification in causal inference.

Authors:  Constantine E Frangakis; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Comparing biomarkers as principal surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments.

Authors:  M Buyse; G Molenberghs; T Burzykowski; D Renard; H Geys
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Commentary on "Principal stratification - a goal or a tool?" by Judea Pearl.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Michael G Hudgens; Julian Wolfson
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 0.968

Review 5.  Correlates of protection induced by vaccination.

Authors:  Stanley A Plotkin
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-05-12

6.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  ASSESSING SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN VACCINE TRIALS WITH CASE-COHORT SAMPLING AND THE COX MODEL.

Authors:  Li Qin; Peter B Gilbert; Dean Follmann; Dongfeng Li
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker.

Authors:  D Y Lin; T R Fleming; V De Gruttola
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria.

Authors:  R L Prentice
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Statistical identifiability and the surrogate endpoint problem, with application to vaccine trials.

Authors:  Julian Wolfson; Peter Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  23 in total

1.  Augmented trial designs for evaluation of principal surrogates.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Dean Follmann
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Evaluating principal surrogate endpoints with time-to-event data accounting for time-varying treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Predicting Overall Vaccine Efficacy in a New Setting by Re-Calibrating Baseline Covariate and Intermediate Response Endpoint Effect Modifiers of Type-Specific Vaccine Efficacy.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ying Huang
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2016-01-23

4.  Inference on treatment effect modification by biomarker response in a three-phase sampling design.

Authors:  Michal Juraska; Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  A method to address between-subject heterogeneity for identification of principal surrogate markers in repeated low-dose challenge HIV vaccine studies.

Authors:  Andrew J Spieker; Ying Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Evaluation and comparison of predictive individual-level general surrogates.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Michael C Sachs; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Neutralizing Antibody Correlates Analysis of Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Efficacy Trials in Asia and Latin America.

Authors:  Zoe Moodie; Michal Juraska; Ying Huang; Yingying Zhuang; Youyi Fong; Lindsay N Carpp; Steven G Self; Laurent Chambonneau; Robert Small; Nicholas Jackson; Fernando Noriega; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation: Principal Stratification Criteria and the Prentice Definition.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Erin E Gabriel; Ying Huang; Ivan S F Chan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2015-02-01

Review 9.  Modeling HIV vaccine trials of the future.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ying Huang; Holly E Janes
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 10.  New clinical trial designs for HIV vaccine evaluation.

Authors:  Zoe Moodie; Holly Janes; Yunda Huang
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.