Literature DB >> 11580024

Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection.

R Brooks1, J A Endler.   

Abstract

Variation among females in mate choice may influence evolution by sexual selection. The genetic basis of this variation is of interest because the elaboration of mating preferences requires additive genetic variation in these traits. Here we measure the repeatability and heritability of two components of female choosiness (responsiveness and discrimination) and of female preference functions for the multiple ornaments borne by male guppies (Poecilia reticulata). We show that there is significant repeatable variation in both components of choosiness and in some preference functions but not in others. There appear to be several male ornaments that females find uniformly attractive and others for which females differ in preference. One consequence is that there is no universally attractive male phenotype. Only responsiveness shows significant additive genetic variation. Variation in responsiveness appears to mask variation in discrimination and some preference functions and may be the most biologically relevant source of phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior. To test the potential evolutionary importance of the phenotypic variation in mate choice that we report, we estimated the opportunity for and the intensity of sexual selection under models of mate choice that excluded and that incorporated individual female variation. We then compared these estimates with estimates based on measured mating success. Incorporating individual variation in mate choice generally did not predict the outcome of sexual selection any better than models that ignored such variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11580024     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00684.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  57 in total

1.  The evolution of risky behaviour in the presence of a sexually transmitted disease.

Authors:  Michael Boots; Robert J Knell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Jennifer L Kelley; Angelo Bisazza; Elisabetta Finazzo; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.

Authors:  Martin Plath; David Bierbach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05

4.  Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Inbreeding load and inbreeding depression estimated from lifetime reproductive success in a small, dispersal-limited population.

Authors:  Janna R Willoughby; Peter M Waser; Anna Brüniche-Olsen; Mark R Christie
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Individual consistency in exploratory behaviour and mating tactics in male guppies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelley; Samuel C Phillips; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-09-14

7.  Conflicting preferences within females: sexual selection versus species recognition.

Authors:  Gil G Rosenthal; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Predicting the direction of ornament evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Darrell J Kemp; David N Reznick; Gregory F Grether; John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies.

Authors:  S A Becher; A E Magurran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences.

Authors:  Holger Schielzeth; Elisabeth Bolund; Wolfgang Forstmeier
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.