PURPOSE: To evaluate a sector analysis program in the assessment and comparison of pre- and post-implant dosimetric parameters during the development of an (125)I permanent prostate brachytherapy service. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 consecutive men being treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy had dose-volume analysis in 12 sectors of their pre-implant ultrasound (USpre) and post-implant CT (CTpost) studies. Individual sectors were created by dividing prostate into three equal lengths, namely base, midgland, and apex. Each of these volumes was then divided into four axial sectors. Dosimetric parameters were compared in adjoining sectors within each study and between studies. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between individual sectors on USpre and CTpost volumes with CTpost higher than USpre (p=0.001). Statistically significant differences were found in corresponding sectors on USpre and CTpost for all dosimetric parameters. The dosimetric parameters were significantly lower on CTpost in the anterior base and midgland (p=0.001) and significantly higher at the posterior apex and midgland (p=0.05). Dose homogeneity was demonstrated in adjoining sectors in all USpre and most adjoining sectors on CTpost. CONCLUSIONS: Sector analysis allows rapid assessment of USpre and CTpost dosimetry. It offers a scientific method of identifying areas of increased and reduced dosing on CTpost when compared with USpre, providing a learning tool to refine dosimetric analysis and highlight sectors where implant quality could be improved.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a sector analysis program in the assessment and comparison of pre- and post-implant dosimetric parameters during the development of an (125)I permanent prostate brachytherapy service. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 50 consecutive men being treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy had dose-volume analysis in 12 sectors of their pre-implant ultrasound (USpre) and post-implant CT (CTpost) studies. Individual sectors were created by dividing prostate into three equal lengths, namely base, midgland, and apex. Each of these volumes was then divided into four axial sectors. Dosimetric parameters were compared in adjoining sectors within each study and between studies. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between individual sectors on USpre and CTpost volumes with CTpost higher than USpre (p=0.001). Statistically significant differences were found in corresponding sectors on USpre and CTpost for all dosimetric parameters. The dosimetric parameters were significantly lower on CTpost in the anterior base and midgland (p=0.001) and significantly higher at the posterior apex and midgland (p=0.05). Dose homogeneity was demonstrated in adjoining sectors in all USpre and most adjoining sectors on CTpost. CONCLUSIONS: Sector analysis allows rapid assessment of USpre and CTpost dosimetry. It offers a scientific method of identifying areas of increased and reduced dosing on CTpost when compared with USpre, providing a learning tool to refine dosimetric analysis and highlight sectors where implant quality could be improved.
Authors: Austin N Kirschner; Vythialingam Sathiaseelan; Yunkai Zhang; James David; John A Kalapurakal Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy Date: 2014-04-03
Authors: Sarah O S Osman; Simon Horn; Darren Brady; Stephen J McMahon; Ahamed B Mohamed Yoosuf; Darren Mitchell; Karen Crowther; Ciara A Lyons; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise; Conor K McGarry; Suneil Jain; Joe M O'Sullivan Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 3.481