Literature DB >> 23401636

Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation: are we optimizing the management of cardiogenic shock?

F Shahid1, M Akhtar, F Khan, C A A Chahal.   

Abstract

Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABPC) has been used in various forms for decades. The change in physiology brought about by their use is conceptually appealing in managing cardiogenic shock and mechanical complications of myocardial infarction. A common myth is that this method of managing acute cardiological emergencies is to be limited to the realms of this specialist field. However, as medical physicians an appreciation and understanding of this novel therapy is essential not only as a lifesaving measure but also as a bridging therapy to more definitive management in the acute medical setting. IABPC is a safe and under-utilized technique despite featuring in all major international guidelines (ESC and ACC) for the management of cardiogenic shock secondary to acute coronary syndromes. Without awareness of this intervention we may be suboptimally managing patients in the first instance. To improve awareness we examine the evidence supporting the use of the IABPC therapy and the contraindications to their use. Complications and advances in technology are also addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23401636      PMCID: PMC3569020          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  Sex and other predictors of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation-related complications: prospective study of 1119 consecutive patients.

Authors:  M Cohen; M S Dawson; C Kopistansky; R McBride
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?

Authors:  Krischan D Sjauw; Annemarie E Engström; Marije M Vis; René J van der Schaaf; Jan Baan; Karel T Koch; Robbert J de Winter; Jan J Piek; Jan G P Tijssen; José P S Henriques
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure.

Authors:  Daniel Levy; Satish Kenchaiah; Martin G Larson; Emelia J Benjamin; Michelle J Kupka; Kalon K L Ho; Joanne M Murabito; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  A Kantrowitz; S Tjonneland; P S Freed; S J Phillips; A N Butner; J L Sherman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

Authors:  T A Sanborn; L A Sleeper; E R Bates; A K Jacobs; J Boland; J K French; J Dens; V Dzavik; S T Palmeri; J G Webb; M Goldberger; J S Hochman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and infarct size in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction without shock: the CRISP AMI randomized trial.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Richard W Smalling; Holger Thiele; Huiman X Barnhart; Yi Zhou; Praveen Chandra; Derek Chew; Marc Cohen; John French; Divaka Perera; E Magnus Ohman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve survival in myocardial infarction complicated by hypotension and suspected cardiogenic shock or heart failure: results of the TACTICS Trial.

Authors:  E Magnus Ohman; John Nanas; Robert J Stomel; Massoud A Leesar; Dennis W T Nielsen; Daniel O'Dea; Felix J Rogers; Daniel Harber; Michael P Hudson; Elizabeth Fraulo; Linda K Shaw; Kerry L Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.

Authors:  Roland Prondzinsky; Henning Lemm; Michael Swyter; Nikolas Wegener; Susanne Unverzagt; Justin M Carter; Martin Russ; Axel Schlitt; Ute Buerke; Arnd Christoph; Hendrik Schmidt; Matthias Winkler; Joachim Thiery; Karl Werdan; Michael Buerke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK trial.

Authors:  John G Webb; April M Lowe; Timothy A Sanborn; Harvey D White; Lynn A Sleeper; Ronald G Carere; Christopher E Buller; S Chiu Wong; Jean Boland; Vlad Dzavik; Mark Porway; Gordon Pate; Geoffrey Bergman; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin M Cheng; Corstiaan A den Uil; Sanne E Hoeks; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  IABP: history-evolution-pathophysiology-indications: what we need to know.

Authors:  H Parissis; V Graham; S Lampridis; M Lau; G Hooks; P C Mhandu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.637

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.