Literature DB >> 2340154

Hemispheric control of spatial attention.

P A Reuter-Lorenz1, M Kinsbourne, M Moscovitch.   

Abstract

According to the activation-orienting hypothesis the distribution of attention in space is biased in the direction contralateral to the more activated hemisphere. The present investigation tested this proposal and evaluated the nature of hemispheric differences in orienting control. Activation imbalance was produced by a unilateral visual stimulus. The distribution of attention was measured using a modified line bisection task in which subjects judged the location of an intersect on a tachistoscopically presented horizontal line. The first three experiments suggest that (a) attention is biased in the direction contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere, and (b) the biases do not depend on the task relevance or hemispatial position of the stimulus producing the activation imbalance. The final three experiments suggest that when orienting conflict is introduced the rightward bias becomes more robust than the leftward bias. The findings are consistent with the activation-orienting hypothesis. Each hemisphere generates a contralateral attentional bias and the rightward bias of the left hemisphere is stronger. The relevance of these findings to understanding unilateral neglect resulting from parietal damage is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2340154     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(90)90018-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  58 in total

1.  Examining the influence of 'noise' on judgements of spatial extent.

Authors:  Derick F Valadao; Marc Hurwitz; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

3.  What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; L Forest Gruss; Steven Garcia; David R Herring; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Line copying: distinct "where" and "aiming" spatial bias in healthy adults.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah; Keith O Gonzalez; A M Barrett
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Measuring attention in the hemispheres: the lateralized attention network test (LANT).

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Anat Barnea; Kristin Herzberg; Anat Rassis; Maital Neta; Amir Raz; Eran Zaidel
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Attentional scanning and space errors.

Authors:  S C Masin; A Agostini
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

7.  Are impairments in visual-spatial attention a critical factor for increased falls risk in seniors? An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Lindsay S Nagamatsu; Teresa Y L Liu-Ambrose; Patrick Carolan; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Line bisection by eye and by hand reveal opposite biases.

Authors:  Ute Leonards; Samantha Stone; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.