Literature DB >> 23400854

What's left? An eye movement study of the influence of interword spaces to the left of fixation during reading.

Timothy R Jordan1, Victoria A McGowan, Kevin B Paterson.   

Abstract

In English and other alphabetic systems read from left to right, the useful information acquired during each fixational pause is generally reported to extend 14-15 character spaces to the right of each fixation, but only 3-4 character spaces to the left, and certainly no farther than the beginning of the fixated word. However, this leftward extent is remarkably small and seems inconsistent with the general bilateral symmetry of vision. Accordingly, in the present study we investigated the influence of a fundamental component of text to the left of fixation-interword spaces-using a well-established eyetracking paradigm in which invisible boundaries were set up along individual sentence displays that were then read. Each boundary corresponded to the leftmost edge of a word in a sentence, so that as the eyes crossed a boundary, interword spaces in the text to the left of that word were obscured (by inserting a letter x). The proximity of the obscured text during each fixational pause was maintained at one, two, three, or four interword spaces from the left boundary of each fixated word. Normal fixations, regressions, and progressive saccades were disrupted when the obscured text was up to three interword spaces (an average of over 12 character spaces) away from the fixated word, while four interword spaces away produced no disruption. These findings suggest that influential information from text is acquired during each fixational pause from much farther leftward than is generally realized and that this information contributes to normal reading performance. Implications of these findings for reading are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23400854     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0372-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading.

Authors:  K S Binder; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Assessing the importance of letter pairs in initial, exterior, and interior positions in reading.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Sharon M Thomas; Geoffrey R Patching; Kenneth C Scott-Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Simon P Liversedge; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: a critical assessment of recent research.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Eye movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Monica S Castelhano; Jinmian Yang
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-09

7.  Targeting regressions: do readers pay attention to the left?

Authors:  Jens K Apel; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

8.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; S Bolozky; A D Well; K Rayner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

10.  The design and use of a new near-vision chart.

Authors:  I L Bailey; J E Lovie
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Reading direction and the central perceptual span: evidence from Arabic and English.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Abubaker A A Almabruk; Eman A Gadalla; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

2.  Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Jasmine Dixon; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28

3.  Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in visual word recognition: Evidence from English.

Authors:  Lin Li; Sha Li; Jingxin Wang; Victoria A McGowan; Pingping Liu; Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Parafoveal processing and transposed-letter effects in dyslexic reading.

Authors:  Julie A Kirkby; Rhiannon S Barrington; Denis Drieghe; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Reading direction and the central perceptual span in Urdu and English.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Sameen Malik; Lily Abedipour; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Stoyan Kurtev; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.