Literature DB >> 10464948

Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading.

K S Binder1, A Pollatsek, K Rayner.   

Abstract

The present experiment used 2 different eye-contingent display change techniques to determine whether information is extracted from English text even when it is to the left of the currently fixated word. Preview display changes were during the 1st saccade entering the target word region, whereas postview display changes were during the 1st saccade leaving that region. Previews and postviews were either identical, related, or unrelated to the target word. "Wrong" information in the target-word region affected reading even when that information was seen only after readers were fixating to the right of that region: When readers skipped the target word, such information caused readers to regress to the target word more; when readers initially fixated the target word, such information increased "2nd-pass" processing time on the target region. The data suggest that readers often still attend to a word after it is skipped and that when readers fixate a word, they occasionally attend to the word after they have begun to fixate the next word.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10464948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The function of regressions in reading: backward eye movements allow rereading.

Authors:  Robert W Booth; Ulrich W Weger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-01

3.  Targeting regressions: do readers pay attention to the left?

Authors:  Jens K Apel; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

4.  What's left? An eye movement study of the influence of interword spaces to the left of fixation during reading.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

Review 5.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

6.  Reading direction and the central perceptual span: evidence from Arabic and English.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Abubaker A A Almabruk; Eman A Gadalla; Victoria A McGowan; Sarah J White; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

7.  E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Chen Chen; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Elizabeth R Schotter; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

9.  Self-consistent estimation of mislocated fixations during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun; Chen Chen; Amanda Heffner-Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.