Literature DB >> 23400679

Comparison of COBAS 4800 KRAS, TaqMan PCR and high resolution melting PCR assays for the detection of KRAS somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded colorectal carcinomas.

Alexandre Harlé1, Benoit Busser, Marie Rouyer, Valentin Harter, Pascal Genin, Agnès Leroux, Jean-Louis Merlin.   

Abstract

Many studies documented the influence of KRAS mutation status on the response of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. The COBAS 4800 KRAS is an assay using real time PCR and TaqMelt technology, CE-IVD validated, for the detection of 19 KRAS somatic mutations in exons 2 and 3. We compared COBAS with previously validated PCR TaqMan and High Resolution Melting (HRM) assays on 156 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens of colorectal carcinoma. DNA extraction procedures, using the Qiagen QiAMP kit and the Roche COBAS DNA kit, were also compared. Of the 156 samples, 132 were interpretable using COBAS and TaqMan and 92 using COBAS and HRM. No statistically significant difference was found between COBAS/TaqMan and COBAS/HRM (k = 0.937; p < 0.001 - four discordant cases were found, mostly concerning codon 61 mutations and k = 0.891; p < 0.001 - five discordant cases were found, three regarding codon 61 and two on codon 12/13, respectively). No difference was found between the two DNA extraction methods (t = 1.7185; dol = 39; α = 5 %). The three assays were found suitable to detect accurately KRAS mutations in colon FFPE specimens. COBAS and TaqMan were found to be more robust than HRM, as they yielded fewer non-interpretable results. DNA extraction kits were found to provide equivalent results. The present study shows that pre-screening using COBAS with further TaqMan mutation characterization constitutes an easy and reliable approach for routine diagnostic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23400679     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1380-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  29 in total

Review 1.  The use of real-time PCR methods in DNA sequence variation analysis.

Authors:  Neil J Gibson
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Authors:  Wendy De Roock; Derek J Jonker; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Dongsheng Tu; Salvatore Siena; Simona Lamba; Sabrina Arena; Milo Frattini; Hubert Piessevaux; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris J O'Callaghan; Shirin Khambata-Ford; John R Zalcberg; John Simes; Christos S Karapetis; Alberto Bardelli; Sabine Tejpar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; I Bondarenko; J T Hartmann; F de Braud; G Schuch; A Zubel; I Celik; M Schlichting; P Koralewski
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Carsten Bokemeyer; Eric Van Cutsem; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello; Steffen Heeger; Michael Schlichting; Ilhan Celik; Claus-Henning Köhne
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Biological and biochemical properties of human rasH genes mutated at codon 61.

Authors:  C J Der; T Finkel; G M Cooper
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-01-17       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Comparison of KRAS mutation tests in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Veysel Sabri Hancer; Murat Buyukdogan; Ilknur Türkmen; Nuray Bassullu; Tuncay Altug; Reyhan Diz-Kucukkaya; Gulen Bulbul-Dogusoy; Gokhan Demir
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-06-23

7.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Pyrosequencing method to detect KRAS mutation in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissues.

Authors:  Sandrine Dufort; Marie-Jeanne Richard; Florence de Fraipont
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.365

10.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Loupakis; A Ruzzo; C Cremolini; B Vincenzi; L Salvatore; D Santini; G Masi; I Stasi; E Canestrari; E Rulli; I Floriani; K Bencardino; N Galluccio; V Catalano; G Tonini; M Magnani; G Fontanini; F Basolo; A Falcone; F Graziano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  19 in total

1.  Evaluation of the cobas Cdiff Test for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Stephen A Young; Thomas E Davis; Zi-Xuam Wang; John Duncan; Christopher Noutsios; Oliver Liesenfeld; John C Osiecki; Michael A Lewinski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Current companion diagnostics in advanced colorectal cancer; getting a bigger and better piece of the pie.

Authors:  Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz; Kanwal P S Raghav
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

3.  Comparison of Three Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of PIK3CA Somatic Mutations in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues of Patients with Breast Carcinomas.

Authors:  A Lambert; J Salleron; M Lion; M Rouyer; N Lozano; A Leroux; J L Merlin; Alexandre Harlé
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Comparison of Five Different Assays for the Detection of BRAF Mutations in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Claire Franczak; Julia Salleron; Cindy Dubois; Pierre Filhine-Trésarrieu; Agnès Leroux; Jean-Louis Merlin; Alexandre Harlé
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.074

5.  Detection of EGFR mutation in supernatant, cell pellets of pleural effusion and tumor tissues from non-small cell lung cancer patients by high resolution melting analysis and sequencing.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Ye Gu; Rui Du; Min Deng; Yaodan Lu; Yanqing Ding
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  High-resolution melting (HRM) re-analysis of a polyposis patients cohort reveals previously undetected heterozygous and mosaic APC gene mutations.

Authors:  Astrid A Out; Ivonne J H M van Minderhout; Nienke van der Stoep; Lysette S R van Bommel; Irma Kluijt; Cora Aalfs; Marsha Voorendt; Rolf H A M Vossen; Maartje Nielsen; Hans F A Vasen; Hans Morreau; Peter Devilee; Carli M J Tops; Frederik J Hes
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Performance of a novel KRAS mutation assay for formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kazuko Sakai; Azusa Yoneshige; Akihiko Ito; Yoji Ueda; Satoshi Kondo; Hitoshi Nobumasa; Yoshihiko Fujita; Yosuke Togashi; Masato Terashima; Marco A De Velasco; Shuta Tomida; Kazuto Nishio
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-01-05

8.  Detection of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF by mass spectrometry - a sensitive, reliable, fast and cost-effective technique.

Authors:  Mark Kriegsmann; Norbert Arens; Volker Endris; Wilko Weichert; Jörg Kriegsmann
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Single-Tubed Wild-Type Blocking Quantitative PCR Detection Assay for the Sensitive Detection of Codon 12 and 13 KRAS Mutations.

Authors:  Jun-Fu Huang; Dong-Zhu Zeng; Guang-Jie Duan; Yan Shi; Guo-Hong Deng; Han Xia; Han-Qing Xu; Na Zhao; Wei-Ling Fu; Qing Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analyses of clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic associations of KRAS codon 61 and codon 146 mutations in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review.

Authors:  Yu Imamura; Paul Lochhead; Mai Yamauchi; Aya Kuchiba; Zhi Rong Qian; Xiaoyun Liao; Reiko Nishihara; Seungyoun Jung; Kana Wu; Katsuhiko Nosho; Yaoyu E Wang; Shouyong Peng; Adam J Bass; Kevin M Haigis; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.