A C Del Re1, Natalya Maisel, Janet Blodgett, John Finney. 1. HSR&D Center for Health Care Evaluation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University Medical School, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. acdelre@stanford.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral naltrexone is an FDA-approved medication for treating alcohol use disorders. Although its efficacy has been supported in multiple clinical trials, an earlier review found that its effect sizes (ESs) on relapse to heavy drinking and, to a lesser extent, percent days drinking were smaller in more recent trials and in multicenter than in single-site studies. We examined whether these findings held when studies from 2004 to 2009 were taken into account, and whether single-site versus multicenter trials, the use of placebo run-in periods, and placebo group improvement accounted for variation in naltrexone effects and decreasing effects over time. METHODS: A multivariate meta-analysis of naltrexone pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorders was conducted. All analyses simultaneously modeled ESs on outcomes of percent days abstinent and relapse to heavy drinking. Potential moderators of medication effects that were examined included publication year, multicenter design (vs. single site), placebo run-in period, and placebo group improvement. RESULTS: Statistically significant between-group differences on percent days abstinent (the inverse of percent days drinking) and relapse to heavy drinking favored naltrexone over placebo. Year of publication was a significant moderator for both outcomes, with more recent trials having smaller ESs. Neither multi- versus single-site study, the interaction between multi- versus single-site study and year of publication, nor placebo run-in period was a significant moderator of naltrexone effects. Although placebo group improvement was modestly associated with smaller between-group naltrexone versus placebo ESs, only 21 studies provided usable information on placebo group improvement. Within those studies, there was no relationship between naltrexone ESs and time, so placebo group improvement was not examined as a moderator of that relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Naltrexone ESs have attenuated over time. Moderators that explain why effects have been decreasing remain to be determined.
BACKGROUND: Oral naltrexone is an FDA-approved medication for treating alcohol use disorders. Although its efficacy has been supported in multiple clinical trials, an earlier review found that its effect sizes (ESs) on relapse to heavy drinking and, to a lesser extent, percent days drinking were smaller in more recent trials and in multicenter than in single-site studies. We examined whether these findings held when studies from 2004 to 2009 were taken into account, and whether single-site versus multicenter trials, the use of placebo run-in periods, and placebo group improvement accounted for variation in naltrexone effects and decreasing effects over time. METHODS: A multivariate meta-analysis of naltrexone pharmacotherapy trials for alcohol use disorders was conducted. All analyses simultaneously modeled ESs on outcomes of percent days abstinent and relapse to heavy drinking. Potential moderators of medication effects that were examined included publication year, multicenter design (vs. single site), placebo run-in period, and placebo group improvement. RESULTS: Statistically significant between-group differences on percent days abstinent (the inverse of percent days drinking) and relapse to heavy drinking favored naltrexone over placebo. Year of publication was a significant moderator for both outcomes, with more recent trials having smaller ESs. Neither multi- versus single-site study, the interaction between multi- versus single-site study and year of publication, nor placebo run-in period was a significant moderator of naltrexone effects. Although placebo group improvement was modestly associated with smaller between-group naltrexone versus placebo ESs, only 21 studies provided usable information on placebo group improvement. Within those studies, there was no relationship between naltrexoneESs and time, so placebo group improvement was not examined as a moderator of that relationship. CONCLUSIONS:NaltrexoneESs have attenuated over time. Moderators that explain why effects have been decreasing remain to be determined.
Authors: A C Del Re; Natalya Maisel; Janet C Blodgett; Paula Wilbourne; John W Finney Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Natalya C Maisel; Janet C Blodgett; Paula L Wilbourne; Keith Humphreys; John W Finney Journal: Addiction Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Sarah Weiss; Eva Welzel; Arthur J Barsky; Stefan G Hofmann Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Aaron S Kemp; Nina R Schooler; Amir H Kalali; Larry Alphs; Ravi Anand; George Awad; Michael Davidson; Sanjay Dubé; Larry Ereshefsky; Georges Gharabawi; Andrew C Leon; Jean-Pierre Lepine; Steven G Potkin; An Vermeulen Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Raye Z Litten; I-Jen P Castle; Daniel Falk; Megan Ryan; Joanne Fertig; Chiung M Chen; Hsiao-ye Yi Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Amanda Elton; Samantha Dove; Cory N Spencer; Donita L Robinson; Charlotte A Boettiger Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Montserrat Navarro; Kendall L Luhn; Alexey B Kampov-Polevoy; James C Garbutt; Todd E Thiele Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Scott H Stewart; Kimberly S Walitzer; Javier Blanco; Denise Swiatek; Linda Paine Hughes; Adolfo Quiñones-Lombraña; Kathleen Shyhalla Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2019-05-04