AIMS: Although debates over the efficacy of oral naltrexone and acamprosate in treating alcohol use disorders tend to focus on their global efficacy relative to placebo or their efficacy relative to each other, the underlying reality may be more nuanced. This meta-analysis examined when naltrexone and acamprosate are most helpful by testing: (i) the relative efficacy of each medication given its presumed mechanism of action (reducing heavy drinking versus fostering abstinence) and (ii) whether different ways of implementing each medication (required abstinence before treatment, detoxification before treatment, goal of treatment, length of treatment, dosage) moderate its effects. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified 64 randomized, placebo-controlled, English-language clinical trials completed between 1970 and 2009 focused on acamprosate or naltrexone. RESULTS: Acamprosate had a significantly larger effect size than naltrexone on the maintenance of abstinence, and naltrexone had a larger effect size than acamprosate on the reduction of heavy drinking and craving. For naltrexone, requiring abstinence before the trial was associated with larger effect sizes for abstinence maintenance and reduced heavy drinking compared with placebo. For acamprosate, detoxification before medication administration was associated with better abstinence outcomes compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment for alcohol use disorders, acamprosate has been found to be slightly more efficacious in promoting abstinence and naltrexone slightly more efficacious in reducing heavy drinking and craving. Detoxification before treatment or a longer period of required abstinence before treatment is associated with larger medication effects for acamprosate and naltrexone respectively. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
AIMS: Although debates over the efficacy of oral naltrexone and acamprosate in treating alcohol use disorders tend to focus on their global efficacy relative to placebo or their efficacy relative to each other, the underlying reality may be more nuanced. This meta-analysis examined when naltrexone and acamprosate are most helpful by testing: (i) the relative efficacy of each medication given its presumed mechanism of action (reducing heavy drinking versus fostering abstinence) and (ii) whether different ways of implementing each medication (required abstinence before treatment, detoxification before treatment, goal of treatment, length of treatment, dosage) moderate its effects. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified 64 randomized, placebo-controlled, English-language clinical trials completed between 1970 and 2009 focused on acamprosate or naltrexone. RESULTS:Acamprosate had a significantly larger effect size than naltrexone on the maintenance of abstinence, and naltrexone had a larger effect size than acamprosate on the reduction of heavy drinking and craving. For naltrexone, requiring abstinence before the trial was associated with larger effect sizes for abstinence maintenance and reduced heavy drinking compared with placebo. For acamprosate, detoxification before medication administration was associated with better abstinence outcomes compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment for alcohol use disorders, acamprosate has been found to be slightly more efficacious in promoting abstinence and naltrexone slightly more efficacious in reducing heavy drinking and craving. Detoxification before treatment or a longer period of required abstinence before treatment is associated with larger medication effects for acamprosate and naltrexone respectively. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Helen M Pettinati; Charles P O'Brien; Amanda R Rabinowitz; Shoshana P Wortman; David W Oslin; Kyle M Kampman; Charles A Dackis Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Stephanie S O'Malley; James C Garbutt; David R Gastfriend; Qunming Dong; Henry R Kranzler Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Helen M Pettinati; Kyle M Kampman; Kevin G Lynch; Hu Xie; Charles Dackis; Amanda R Rabinowitz; Charles P O'Brien Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2007-11-17 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Stephanie S O'Malley; Rajita Sinha; Carlos M Grilo; Christy Capone; Conor K Farren; Sherry A McKee; Bruce J Rounsaville; Ran Wu Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Kirsten C Morley; Maree Teesson; Sophie C Reid; Claudia Sannibale; Clare Thomson; Nghi Phung; Martin Weltman; James R Bell; Kylie Richardson; Paul S Haber Journal: Addiction Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Jennifer W Tidey; Peter M Monti; Damaris J Rohsenow; Chad J Gwaltney; Robert Miranda; John E McGeary; James MacKillop; Robert M Swift; David B Abrams; Saul Shiffman; Jean A Paty Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Dena Davidson; Philip W Wirtz; Suzy Bird Gulliver; Richard Longabaugh Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2007-05-19 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Katherine M J McMurray; Preetpal S Sidhu; James M Cook; Leggy A Arnold; Abraham A Palmer Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Andrea K Finlay; Ingrid Binswanger; Christine Timko; Joel Rosenthal; Sean Clark; Jessica Blue-Howells; Jim McGuire; Hildi Hagedorn; Jessie Wong; James Van Campen; Alex H S Harris Journal: Crim Justice Policy Rev Date: 2016-04-18
Authors: Mateusz Gola; Małgorzata Wordecha; Guillaume Sescousse; Michał Lew-Starowicz; Bartosz Kossowski; Marek Wypych; Scott Makeig; Marc N Potenza; Artur Marchewka Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Robert L Cook; Zhi Zhou; Maria Jose Miguez; Clery Quiros; Luis Espinoza; John E Lewis; Babette Brumback; Kendall Bryant Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Jarrod M Ellingson; Wendy S Slutske; Alvaro Vergés; Andrew K Littlefield; Dixie J Statham; Nicholas G Martin Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.582