Literature DB >> 23397550

Penalized likelihood phenotyping: unifying voxelwise analyses and multi-voxel pattern analyses in neuroimaging: penalized likelihood phenotyping.

Nagesh Adluru1, Bret M Hanlon, Antoine Lutz, Janet E Lainhart, Andrew L Alexander, Richard J Davidson.   

Abstract

Neuroimage phenotyping for psychiatric and neurological disorders is performed using voxelwise analyses also known as voxel based analyses or morphometry (VBM). A typical voxelwise analysis treats measurements at each voxel (e.g., fractional anisotropy, gray matter probability) as outcome measures to study the effects of possible explanatory variables (e.g., age, group) in a linear regression setting. Furthermore, each voxel is treated independently until the stage of correction for multiple comparisons. Recently, multi-voxel pattern analyses (MVPA), such as classification, have arisen as an alternative to VBM. The main advantage of MVPA over VBM is that the former employ multivariate methods which can account for interactions among voxels in identifying significant patterns. They also provide ways for computer-aided diagnosis and prognosis at individual subject level. However, compared to VBM, the results of MVPA are often more difficult to interpret and prone to arbitrary conclusions. In this paper, first we use penalized likelihood modeling to provide a unified framework for understanding both VBM and MVPA. We then utilize statistical learning theory to provide practical methods for interpreting the results of MVPA beyond commonly used performance metrics, such as leave-one-out-cross validation accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, we demonstrate that there are challenges in MVPA when trying to obtain image phenotyping information in the form of statistical parametric maps (SPMs), which are commonly obtained from VBM, and provide a bootstrap strategy as a potential solution for generating SPMs using MVPA. This technique also allows us to maximize the use of available training data. We illustrate the empirical performance of the proposed framework using two different neuroimaging studies that pose different levels of challenge for classification using MVPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397550      PMCID: PMC3624987          DOI: 10.1007/s12021-012-9175-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroinformatics        ISSN: 1539-2791


  44 in total

1.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Region of interest based analysis of functional imaging data.

Authors:  Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Satrajit S Ghosh; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Does cognitive science need kernels?

Authors:  Frank Jäkel; Bernhard Schölkopf; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Diffusion based abnormality markers of pathology: toward learned diagnostic prediction of ASD.

Authors:  Madhura Ingalhalikar; Drew Parker; Luke Bloy; Timothy P L Roberts; Ragini Verma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Predictive markers for AD in a multi-modality framework: an analysis of MCI progression in the ADNI population.

Authors:  Chris Hinrichs; Vikas Singh; Guofan Xu; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

10.  Max Margin General Linear Modeling for Neuroimage Analyses.

Authors:  Nagesh Adluru; Chad M Ennis; Richard J Davidson; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  Proc Workshop Math Methods Biomed Image Analysis       Date:  2012-01-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Voxel-based morphometry multi-center mega-analysis of brain structure in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam; Henk van Steenbergen; J Nienke Pannekoek; Jean-Paul Fouche; Christine Lochner; Coenraad J Hattingh; Henk R Cremers; Tomas Furmark; Kristoffer N T Månsson; Andreas Frick; Jonas Engman; Carl-Johan Boraxbekk; Per Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson; Mats Fredrikson; Thomas Straube; Jutta Peterburs; Heide Klumpp; K Luan Phan; Karin Roelofs; Dick J Veltman; Marie-José van Tol; Dan J Stein; Nic J A van der Wee
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.881

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.