Literature DB >> 19729333

Does cognitive science need kernels?

Frank Jäkel1, Bernhard Schölkopf, Felix A Wichmann.   

Abstract

Kernel methods are among the most successful tools in machine learning and are used in challenging data analysis problems in many disciplines. Here we provide examples where kernel methods have proven to be powerful tools for analyzing behavioral data, especially for identifying features in categorization experiments. We also demonstrate that kernel methods relate to perceptrons and exemplar models of categorization. Hence, we argue that kernel methods have neural and psychological plausibility, and theoretical results concerning their behavior are therefore potentially relevant for human category learning. In particular, we believe kernel methods have the potential to provide explanations ranging from the implementational via the algorithmic to the computational level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19729333     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  9 in total

1.  Second-order induction in prediction problems.

Authors:  Rossella Argenziano; Itzhak Gilboa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Categorization = decision making + generalization.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Limits in decision making arise from limits in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Gyslain Giguère; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Statistical learning analysis in neuroscience: aiming for transparency.

Authors:  Michael Hanke; Yaroslav O Halchenko; James V Haxby; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Invariance in visual object recognition requires training: a computational argument.

Authors:  Robbe L T Goris; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Reinforcement Learning and Episodic Memory in Humans and Animals: An Integrative Framework.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Penalized likelihood phenotyping: unifying voxelwise analyses and multi-voxel pattern analyses in neuroimaging: penalized likelihood phenotyping.

Authors:  Nagesh Adluru; Bret M Hanlon; Antoine Lutz; Janet E Lainhart; Andrew L Alexander; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-04

8.  Using human brain activity to guide machine learning.

Authors:  Ruth C Fong; Walter J Scheirer; David D Cox
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Dynamic neural circuit disruptions associated with antisocial behaviors.

Authors:  Weixiong Jiang; Han Zhang; Ling-Li Zeng; Hui Shen; Jian Qin; Kim-Han Thung; Pew-Thian Yap; Huasheng Liu; Dewen Hu; Wei Wang; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.399

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.