Literature DB >> 23397260

Working memory effects in speeded RSVP tasks.

Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño1, Mary C Potter, Carmen Rodríguez.   

Abstract

The present paper examines the effects of memory contents and memory load in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) speeded tasks, trying to explain previous inconsistent results. We used a one target (Experiment 1) and a two-target (Experiment 2) RSVP task with a concurrent memory load of one or four items, in a dual-task paradigm. A relation between material in working memory and the target in the RSVP impaired the identification of the target. In Experiments 3 and 4, the single task was to determine whether any information in memory matched the target in the RSVP, while varying the memory load. A match was detected faster than a non-match, although only when there was some distance between targets in the RSVP (Experiment 4). The results suggest that memory contents automatically capture attention, slowing processing when the memory contents are irrelevant to the task, and speeding processing when they are relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397260     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0479-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  20 in total

1.  Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; John Duncan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Attention blinks for selection, not perception or memory: reading sentences and reporting targets.

Authors:  Mary C Potter; Brad Wyble; Jennifer Olejarczyk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Memory reloaded: memory load effects in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Min-Shik Kim; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Attentional distractor interference may be diminished by concurrent working memory load in normal participants and traumatic brain injury patients.

Authors:  Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño; Carlo Umiltà; Franca Stablum; Francesca Tebaldi; Anna Cantagallo
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Content-specific working memory modulation of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Ali Abedian-Amiri; Sonja M Ostermeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  I can look for it! Modulation of a concurrent Visual Working Memory task in Visual Search in development.

Authors:  María Quirós-Godoy; Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño; Elena Perez-Hernandez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.