Literature DB >> 22022894

Attention blinks for selection, not perception or memory: reading sentences and reporting targets.

Mary C Potter1, Brad Wyble, Jennifer Olejarczyk.   

Abstract

In whole report, a sentence presented sequentially at the rate of about 10 words/s can be recalled accurately, whereas if the task is to report only two target words (e.g., red words), the second target suffers an attentional blink if it appears shortly after the first target. If these two tasks are carried out simultaneously, is there an attentional blink, and does it affect both tasks? Here, sentence report was combined with report of two target words (Experiments 1 and 2) or two inserted target digits, Arabic numerals or word digits (Experiments 3 and 4). When participants reported only the targets an attentional blink was always observed. When they reported both the sentence and targets, sentence report was quite accurate but there was an attentional blink in picking out the targets when they were part of the sentence. When targets were extra digits inserted in the sentence there was no blink when viewers also reported the sentence. These results challenge some theories of the attentional blink: Blinks result from online selection, not perception or memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22022894     DOI: 10.1037/a0025976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  2 in total

1.  Working memory effects in speeded RSVP tasks.

Authors:  Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño; Mary C Potter; Carmen Rodríguez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-09

2.  Conceptual short term memory in perception and thought.

Authors:  Mary C Potter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.