Literature DB >> 23397185

Natural category discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) at three levels of abstraction.

Jennifer Vonk1, Stephanie E Jett, Kelly W Mosteller, Moriah Galvan.   

Abstract

Two adult chimpanzees were presented with a series of natural category discrimination tasks on a touch screen computer, in which the discriminations varied in degree of abstraction. At the concrete level, discriminations could be made on the basis of single perceptual features, but at the more abstract level, categories were more inclusive, containing exemplars with variant perceptual features. For instance, at the most abstract level, the chimpanzees were required to select images of animals rather than nonanimals, and exemplars within both categories were perceptually diverse. One chimpanzee showed positive transfer at each level of abstraction but required more sessions to reach criterion as the discriminations became more abstract. The other chimpanzee failed to demonstrate consistent significant acquisition of a concept. The results indicate that unlike other apes and black bears, tested previously, chimpanzees found the most abstract discriminations the most difficult to acquire. Analyses of the features of pictures that yielded high or low accuracy revealed no significant differences on several key features, suggesting that the presence of facial features, eyes, or specific coloration did not control responding. In addition, the chimpanzees performed more accurately with photos judged as less typical exemplars of the category by human raters. However, responses to pictures of particular species suggest that chimpanzees may rely on perceptual similarity to familiar exemplars when acquiring experimenter-defined natural categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397185     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-013-0103-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  27 in total

1.  Natural concepts in a juvenile gorilla (gorilla gorilla gorilla) at three levels of abstraction.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Suzanne E MacDonald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-11

3.  Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Kate L Freiburger; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

4.  The use of perceptual features in categorization by orangutans (Pongo abelli).

Authors:  Heidi L Marsh; Suzanne E MacDonald
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18

6.  Visual preference by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) for photos of primates measured by a free choice-order task: implication for influence of social experience.

Authors:  Masayuki Tanaka
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  From Perceptual Categories to Concepts: What Develops?

Authors:  Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-09-01

8.  Humans and monkeys share visual representations.

Authors:  Denis Fize; Maxime Cauchoix; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Visual categorization of natural stimuli by domestic dogs.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Anthony A Wright; Eric E Drachman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  4 in total

1.  Object sorting into a two-dimensional array in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Misato Hayashi; Hideko Takeshita
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Matching based on biological categories in Orangutans (Pongo abelii) and a Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Social and nonsocial category discriminations in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and American black bears (Ursus americanus).

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Zoe Johnson-Ulrich
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.926

4.  Ambiguous Results When Using the Ambiguous-Cue Paradigm to Assess Learning and Cognitive Bias in Gorillas and a Black Bear.

Authors:  Molly C McGuire; Jennifer Vonk; Zoe Johnson-Ulrich
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.