Literature DB >> 15875984

Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels.

Olga F Lazareva1, Kate L Freiburger, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

We studied categorization in pigeons, using carefully controlled photographs. Within daily sessions, 4 pigeons had to classify each of 32 photographs into either its proper basic-level category (cars, chairs, flowers, or people; four-key forced choice procedure) or its proper superordinate-level category (natural or artificial; two-key forced choice procedure). The pigeons successfully classified the same stimuli at both levels. Overall, the pigeons learned the basic discrimination more quickly than the superordinate discrimination, but this difference was reliable only for artificial stimuli (cars and chairs), not for natural stimuli (flowers and people). The pigeons also exhibited reliable discrimination transfer to novel photographs, attesting to the open-endedness of these basic and superordinate categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15875984     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  Natural concepts in a juvenile gorilla (gorilla gorilla gorilla) at three levels of abstraction.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Suzanne E MacDonald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; D H LOVELAND
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  High-order concept formation in the pigeon.

Authors:  R E Lubow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Simple algorithms for M-alternative forced-choice calculations.

Authors:  J E Smith
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-01

5.  Categorization in infancy.

Authors:  Denis Mareschal; Paul C. Quinn
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Infants can rapidly form new categorical representations.

Authors:  Rebecca J Ribar; Lisa M Oakes; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

7.  Pictorial similarity judgments and the organization of visual memory in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S F Sands; C E Lincoln; A A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1982-12

8.  Categorization of natural stimuli by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus set size and modification of exemplars.

Authors:  A M Schrier; P M Brady
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1987-04
  8 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Relational learning in a context of transposition: a review.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Dominant vertical orientation processing without clustered maps: early visual brain dynamics imaged with voltage-sensitive dye in the pigeon visual Wulst.

Authors:  Benedict Shien Wei Ng; Agnieszka Grabska-Barwińska; Onur Güntürkün; Dirk Jancke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Associative concept learning in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Edward A Wasserman; Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Visual artificial grammar learning: comparative research on humans, kea (Nestor notabilis) and pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; Gesche Westphal-Fitch; Ulrike Aust; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effect of between-category similarity on basic level superiority in pigeons.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Fabián A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Selective attention, diffused attention, and the development of categorization.

Authors:  Wei Sophia Deng; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The development of categorization: effects of classification and inference training on category representation.

Authors:  Wei Sophia Deng; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-19

8.  Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2009-05-01

9.  Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Daniel I Brooks; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Natural category discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) at three levels of abstraction.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Stephanie E Jett; Kelly W Mosteller; Moriah Galvan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.