Literature DB >> 23397040

Motion perception by a moving observer in a three-dimensional environment.

Lucile Dupin1, Mark Wexler.   

Abstract

Perceiving three-dimensional object motion while moving through the world is hard: not only must optic flow be segmented and parallax resolved into shape and motion, but also observer motion needs to be taken into account in order to perceive absolute, rather than observer-relative motion. In order to simplify the last step, it has recently been suggested that if the visual background is stationary, then foreground object motion, computed relative to the background, directly yields absolute motion. A series of studies with immobile observers and optic flow simulating observer movement have provided evidence that observers actually utilize this so-called "flow parsing" strategy (Rushton & Warren, 2005). We test this hypothesis by using mobile observers (as well as immobile ones) who judge the motion in depth of a foreground object in the presence of a stationary or moving background. We find that background movement does influence motion perception but not as much as predicted by the flow-parsing hypothesis. Thus, we find evidence that, in order to perceive absolute motion, observers partly use flow-parsing but also compensate egocentric motion by a global self-motion estimate.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397040     DOI: 10.1167/13.2.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Multisensory self-motion compensation during object trajectory judgments.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Paul R MacNeilage; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Direct coupling of haptic signals between hands.

Authors:  Lucile Dupin; Vincent Hayward; Mark Wexler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A Neural Model of MST and MT Explains Perceived Object Motion during Self-Motion.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dissociation of Self-Motion and Object Motion by Linear Population Decoding That Approximates Marginalization.

Authors:  Ryo Sasaki; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Computational Mechanisms for Perceptual Stability using Disparity and Motion Parallax.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Perception of object motion during self-motion: Correlated biases in judgments of heading direction and object motion.

Authors:  Xing Xing; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

7.  The Primary Role of Flow Processing in the Identification of Scene-Relative Object Movement.

Authors:  Simon K Rushton; Diederick C Niehorster; Paul A Warren; Li Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Visual Perception of Heading in the Syndrome of Oculopalatal Tremor.

Authors:  Sinem Balta Beylergil; Aasef G Shaikh
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  A catch-up illusion arising from a distance-dependent perception bias in judging relative movement.

Authors:  Tobias Meilinger; Bärbel Garsoffky; Stephan Schwan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Accuracy and Tuning of Flow Parsing for Visual Perception of Object Motion During Self-Motion.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Li Li
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.