OBJECTIVE: To determine whether indication-based computer order entry alerts intercept wrong-patient medication errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At an academic medical center serving inpatients and outpatients, we developed and implemented a clinical decision support system to prompt clinicians for indications when certain medications were ordered without an appropriately coded indication on the problem list. Among all the alerts that fired, we identified every instance when a medication order was started but not completed and, within a fixed time interval, the same prescriber placed an order for the same medication for a different patient. We closely reviewed each of these instances to determine whether they were likely to have been intercepted errors. RESULTS: Over a 6-year period 127 320 alerts fired, which resulted in 32 intercepted wrong-patient errors, an interception rate of 0.25 per 1000 alerts. Neither the location of the prescriber nor the type of prescriber affected the interception rate. No intercepted errors were for patients with the same last name, but in 59% of the intercepted errors the prescriber had both patients' charts open when the first order was initiated. DISCUSSION: Indication alerts linked to the problem list have previously been shown to improve problem list completion. This analysis demonstrates another benefit, the interception of wrong-patient medication errors. CONCLUSIONS: Indication-based alerts yielded a wrong-patient medication error interception rate of 0.25 per 1000 alerts. These alerts could be implemented independently or in combination with other strategies to decrease wrong-patient medication errors.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether indication-based computer order entry alerts intercept wrong-patient medication errors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At an academic medical center serving inpatients and outpatients, we developed and implemented a clinical decision support system to prompt clinicians for indications when certain medications were ordered without an appropriately coded indication on the problem list. Among all the alerts that fired, we identified every instance when a medication order was started but not completed and, within a fixed time interval, the same prescriber placed an order for the same medication for a different patient. We closely reviewed each of these instances to determine whether they were likely to have been intercepted errors. RESULTS: Over a 6-year period 127 320 alerts fired, which resulted in 32 intercepted wrong-patient errors, an interception rate of 0.25 per 1000 alerts. Neither the location of the prescriber nor the type of prescriber affected the interception rate. No intercepted errors were for patients with the same last name, but in 59% of the intercepted errors the prescriber had both patients' charts open when the first order was initiated. DISCUSSION: Indication alerts linked to the problem list have previously been shown to improve problem list completion. This analysis demonstrates another benefit, the interception of wrong-patient medication errors. CONCLUSIONS: Indication-based alerts yielded a wrong-patient medication error interception rate of 0.25 per 1000 alerts. These alerts could be implemented independently or in combination with other strategies to decrease wrong-patient medication errors.
Authors: Emily M Campbell; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone; Richard H Dykstra Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Eric G Poon; Kenneth Guappone; Emily Campbell; Richard H Dykstra Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Christopher A Longhurst; Layla Parast; Christy I Sandborg; Eric Widen; Jill Sullivan; Jin S Hahn; Christopher G Dawes; Paul J Sharek Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jason S Adelman; Gary E Kalkut; Clyde B Schechter; Jeffrey M Weiss; Matthew A Berger; Stan H Reissman; Hillel W Cohen; Stephen J Lorenzen; Daniel A Burack; William N Southern Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joanna Abraham; William L Galanter; Daniel Touchette; Yinglin Xia; Katherine J Holzer; Vania Leung; Thomas Kannampallil Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Scott E Sheehan; Nasia Safdar; Hardeep Singh; Dean F Sittig; Michael A Bruno; Kelli Keller; Samantha Kinnard; Michael C Brunner Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Robert A Green; George Hripcsak; Hojjat Salmasian; Eliot J Lazar; Susan B Bostwick; Suzanne R Bakken; David K Vawdrey Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Thomas G Kannampallil; Joanna Abraham; Anna Solotskaya; Sneha G Philip; Bruce L Lambert; Gordon D Schiff; Adam Wright; William L Galanter Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Anne Grauer; Jerard Kneifati-Hayek; Brian Reuland; Jo R Applebaum; Jason S Adelman; Robert A Green; Jeanette Lisak-Phillips; David Liebovitz; Thomas F Byrd; Preeti Kansal; Cheryl Wilkes; Suzanne Falck; Connie Larson; John Shilka; Elizabeth VanDril; Gordon D Schiff; William L Galanter; Bruce L Lambert Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: William L Galanter; Michelle L Bryson; Suzanne Falck; Rachel Rosenfield; Marci Laragh; Neeha Shrestha; Gordon D Schiff; Bruce L Lambert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.240