Literature DB >> 23396222

Introducing ultrasound-guided vein catheterization into clinical practice: A step-by-step guide for organizing a hands-on training program with inexpensive handmade models.

S Di Domenico1, M Licausi, E Porcile, F Piaggio, B Troilo, M Centanaro, U Valente.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Central vein catheterization (CVC) plays a central role in hospital patient management. Compared with the use of traditional anatomical landmarks, ultrasound-guidance is associated with higher CVC success rates, fewer complications, and more rapid central venous access. The use of US-guided CVC in clinical practice has not become widespread, largely because anesthesiology and general surgery residents receive limited training in this technique. To increase the use of US-guided CVC in our surgical department, we organized a hands-on training program based on the use of handmade models.
METHODS: Three different models were constructed using plastic food-storage containers, segments of rubber tourniquet and silastic tubing (to simulate vessels), and agar gelatin.
RESULTS: The hands-on training course allowed progressive acquisition of the basic hand-eye coordination skills necessary for performing US-guided venipuncture. The overall cost for each model was less than €5.00. DISCUSSION: The models described in this report are useful tools for teaching US-guided CVC. Thanks to their low-cost, they can be widely used to facilitate the introduction of this technique in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central vein catheterization; Handmade models; Training; Ultrasound

Year:  2008        PMID: 23396222      PMCID: PMC3552649          DOI: 10.1016/j.jus.2008.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  18 in total

1.  A simple phantom for learning EUS-guided FNA.

Authors:  Darius Sorbi; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Maurits J Wiersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Injuries and liability related to central vascular catheters: a closed claims analysis.

Authors:  Karen B Domino; T Andrew Bowdle; Karen L Posner; Pete H Spitellie; Lorri A Lee; Frederick W Cheney
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  C A Troianos; D R Jobes; N Ellison
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  A low-cost gelatin phantom for learning sonographically guided interventional breast radiology techniques.

Authors:  G A Sisney; K A Hunt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Cannulation of the internal jugular vein: comparison of the classic Seldinger technique and an ultrasound guided method.

Authors:  P A Conz; D Dissegna; M P Rodighiero; G La Greca
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Training phantom for ultrasound guided biopsy.

Authors:  R A Nicholson; M Crofton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Subclavian vein catheterizations: a prospective study. II. Infectious complications.

Authors:  R W Bernard; W M Stahl; R M Chase
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches.

Authors:  J I Sznajder; F R Zveibil; H Bitterman; P Weiner; S Bursztein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-02

9.  Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial.

Authors:  Truman J Milling; John Rose; William M Briggs; Robert Birkhahn; Theodore J Gaeta; Joseph J Bove; Lawrence A Melniker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 10.  Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Hind; Neill Calvert; Richard McWilliams; Andrew Davidson; Suzy Paisley; Catherine Beverley; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of a low-cost ultrasound pericardiocentesis model.

Authors:  Marco Campo Dell'orto; Dorothea Hempel; Agnieszka Starzetz; Armin Seibel; Ulf Hannemann; Felix Walcher; Raoul Breitkreutz
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 1.112

2.  Agar ultrasound phantoms for low-cost training without refrigeration.

Authors:  Matthew Earle; Giuliano De Portu; Elizabeth DeVos
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.