Literature DB >> 23395827

Why it's easier to remember seeing a face we already know than one we don't: preexisting memory representations facilitate memory formation.

Lynne M Reder1, Lindsay W Victoria, Anna Manelis, Joyce M Oates, Janine M Dutcher, Jordan T Bates, Shaun Cook, Howard J Aizenstein, Joseph Quinlan, Ferenc Gyulai.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we provided support for the hypothesis that stimuli with preexisting memory representations (e.g., famous faces) are easier to associate to their encoding context than are stimuli that lack long-term memory representations (e.g., unknown faces). Subjects viewed faces superimposed on different backgrounds (e.g., the Eiffel Tower). Face recognition on a surprise memory test was better when the encoding background was reinstated than when it was swapped with a different background; however, the reinstatement advantage was modulated by how many faces had been seen with a given background, and reinstatement did not improve recognition for unknown faces. The follow-up experiment added a drug intervention that inhibited the ability to form new associations. Context reinstatement did not improve recognition for famous or unknown faces under the influence of the drug. The results suggest that it is easier to associate context to faces that have a preexisting long-term memory representation than to faces that do not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23395827      PMCID: PMC4180115          DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  41 in total

1.  The effect of midazolam on the modality-match effect in implicit memory.

Authors:  E Hirshman; A Passanante; J Arndt
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-03

2.  A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.

Authors:  Lynn M Reder; Paige Angstadt; Melanie Cary; Michael A Erickson; Michael S Ayers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Jason Arndt; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

4.  Language is not just for talking: redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories.

Authors:  Gary Lupyan; David H Rakison; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-12

5.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Effects of contextual elaboration on face recognition.

Authors:  N H Kerr; E Winograd
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-11

8.  Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.

Authors:  H D Ellis; J W Shepherd; G M Davies
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Famous faces as icons. The illusion of being an expert in the recognition of famous faces.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more
  12 in total

1.  Continued effects of context reinstatement in recognition.

Authors:  Maciej Hanczakowski; Katarzyna Zawadzka; Bill Macken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-07

2.  The effects of context in item-based directed forgetting: Evidence for "one-shot" context storage.

Authors:  Nicole Burgess; William E Hockley; Kathleen L Hourihan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

3.  No evidence that low levels of intoxication at both encoding and retrieval impact scores on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale.

Authors:  Amelia Mindthoff; Jacqueline R Evans; Nadja Schreiber Compo; Karina Polanco; Angelica V Hagsand
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Building knowledge requires bricks, not sand: The critical role of familiar constituents in learning.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Xiaonan L Liu; Alexander Keinath; Vencislav Popov
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

5.  The structure of prior knowledge enhances memory in experts by reducing interference.

Authors:  Erik A Wing; Ford Burles; Jennifer D Ryan; Asaf Gilboa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Early-life education may help bolster declarative memory in old age, especially for women.

Authors:  Jana Reifegerste; João Veríssimo; Michael D Rugg; Mariel Y Pullman; Laura Babcock; Dana A Glei; Maxine Weinstein; Noreen Goldman; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2020-06-05

7.  Delineating the effect of semantic congruency on episodic memory: the role of integration and relatedness.

Authors:  Oded Bein; Neta Livneh; Niv Reggev; Michael Gilead; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein; Anat Maril
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An item's status in semantic memory determines how it is recognized: Dissociable patterns of brain activity observed for famous and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Graham MacKenzie; Georgia Alexandrou; Peter J B Hancock; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Spectral fingerprints or spectral tilt? Evidence for distinct oscillatory signatures of memory formation.

Authors:  Marie-Christin Fellner; Stephanie Gollwitzer; Stefan Rampp; Gernot Kreiselmeyr; Daniel Bush; Beate Diehl; Nikolai Axmacher; Hajo Hamer; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Metamemory in a familiar place: The effects of environmental context on feeling of knowing.

Authors:  Maciej Hanczakowski; Katarzyna Zawadzka; Harriet Collie; Bill Macken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.