Literature DB >> 32858041

An aryl hydrocarbon receptor from the caecilian Gymnopis multiplicata suggests low dioxin affinity in the ancestor of all three amphibian orders.

Sarah A Kazzaz1, Sara Giani Tagliabue2, Diana G Franks3, Michael S Denison4, Mark E Hahn3, Laura Bonati2, Wade H Powell5.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) plays pleiotropic roles in the development and physiology of vertebrates in conjunction with xenobiotic and endogenous ligands. It is best known for mediating the toxic effects of dioxin-like pollutants such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). While most vertebrates possess at least one AHR that binds TCDD tightly, amphibian AHRs bind TCDD with very low affinity. Previous analyses of AHRs from Xenopus laevis (a frog; order Anura) and Ambystoma mexicanum (a salamander; order Caudata) identified three amino acid residues in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) that underlie low-affinity binding. In X. laevis AHR1β, these are A354, A370, and N325. Here we extend the analysis of amphibian AHRs to the caecilian Gymnopis multiplicata, representing the remaining extant amphibian order, Gymnophiona. G. multiplicata AHR groups with the monophyletic vertebrate AHR/AHR1 clade. The LBD includes all three signature residues of low TCDD affinity, and a structural homology model suggests that its architecture closely resembles those of other amphibians. In transactivation assays, the EC50 for reporter gene induction by TCDD was 17.17 nM, comparable to X. laevis AhR1β (26.23 nM) and Ambystoma AHR (34.09 nM) and dramatically higher than mouse AhR (0.13 nM), a trend generally reflected in direct measures of TCDD binding. These shared properties distinguish amphibian AHRs from the high-affinity proteins typical of both vertebrate groups that diverged earlier (teleost fish) and those that appeared more recently (other tetrapods). These findings suggest the hypothesis that AHRs with low TCDD affinity represent a characteristic that evolved in a common ancestor of all three extant amphibian groups.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AHR; Amphibians; Aryl hydrocarbon receptor; Caecilians; Dioxin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32858041      PMCID: PMC7771225          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol        ISSN: 0016-6480            Impact factor:   2.822


  55 in total

1.  On the origin of and phylogenetic relationships among living amphibians.

Authors:  R Zardoya; A Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mitogenomic perspectives on the origin and phylogeny of living amphibians.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Hui Zhou; Yue-Qin Chen; Yi-Fei Liu; Liang-Hu Qu
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians.

Authors:  R Alexander Pyron; John J Wiens
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptors in the frog Xenopus laevis: two AhR1 paralogs exhibit low affinity for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).

Authors:  Jeremy A Lavine; Ashley J Rowatt; Tatyana Klimova; Aric J Whitington; Emelyne Dengler; Catherine Beck; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Evolutionary conservation of the vertebrate Ah (dioxin) receptor: amplification and sequencing of the PAS domain of a teleost Ah receptor cDNA.

Authors:  M E Hahn; S I Karchner
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Toxicity of 2, 3, 7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in larval and adult forms of Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  P W Beatty; M A Holscher; R A Neal
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 7.  Exactly the same but different: promiscuity and diversity in the molecular mechanisms of action of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor.

Authors:  Michael S Denison; Anatoly A Soshilov; Guochun He; Danica E DeGroot; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Effects of steroids and dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) on the developing wolffian ducts of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum).

Authors:  Alan M Vajda; David O Norris
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.822

9.  Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.

Authors:  Domenico Fraccalvieri; Anatoly A Soshilov; Sibel I Karchner; Diana G Franks; Alessandro Pandini; Laura Bonati; Mark E Hahn; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Specific ligand binding domain residues confer low dioxin responsiveness to AHR1β of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Camila Odio; Sarah A Holzman; Michael S Denison; Domenico Fraccalvieri; Laura Bonati; Diana G Franks; Mark E Hahn; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.