PURPOSE: Cathepsin-activated fluorescent probes can detect tumors in mice and in canine patients. We previously showed that these probes can detect microscopic residual sarcoma in the tumor bed of mice during gross total resection. Many patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and other tumors undergo radiation therapy (RT) before surgery. This study assesses the effect of RT on the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between normal and cancerous tissue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A genetically engineered mouse model of STS was used to generate primary hind limb sarcomas that were treated with hypofractionated RT. Mice were injected intravenously with cathepsin-activated fluorescent probes, and various tissues, including the tumor, were imaged using a hand-held imaging device. Resected tumor and normal muscle samples were harvested to assess cathepsin expression by Western blot. Uptake of activated probe was analyzed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Parallel in vitro studies using mouse sarcoma cells were performed. RESULTS: RT of primary STS in mice and mouse sarcoma cell lines caused no change in probe activation or cathepsin protease expression. Increasing radiation dose resulted in an upward trend in probe activation. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence showed that a substantial proportion of probe-labeled cells were CD11b-positive tumor-associated immune cells. CONCLUSIONS: In this primary murine model of STS, RT did not affect the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between tumor and normal muscle. Cathepsin-activated probes labeled tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages. Our results suggest that it would be feasible to include patients who have received preoperative RT in clinical studies evaluating cathepsin-activated imaging probes.
PURPOSE: Cathepsin-activated fluorescent probes can detect tumors in mice and in caninepatients. We previously showed that these probes can detect microscopic residual sarcoma in the tumor bed of mice during gross total resection. Many patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and other tumors undergo radiation therapy (RT) before surgery. This study assesses the effect of RT on the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between normal and cancerous tissue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A genetically engineered mouse model of STS was used to generate primary hind limb sarcomas that were treated with hypofractionated RT. Mice were injected intravenously with cathepsin-activated fluorescent probes, and various tissues, including the tumor, were imaged using a hand-held imaging device. Resected tumor and normal muscle samples were harvested to assess cathepsin expression by Western blot. Uptake of activated probe was analyzed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Parallel in vitro studies using mousesarcoma cells were performed. RESULTS: RT of primary STS in mice and mousesarcoma cell lines caused no change in probe activation or cathepsin protease expression. Increasing radiation dose resulted in an upward trend in probe activation. Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence showed that a substantial proportion of probe-labeled cells were CD11b-positive tumor-associated immune cells. CONCLUSIONS: In this primary murine model of STS, RT did not affect the ability of cathepsin-activated probes to differentiate between tumor and normal muscle. Cathepsin-activated probes labeled tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages. Our results suggest that it would be feasible to include patients who have received preoperative RT in clinical studies evaluating cathepsin-activated imaging probes.
Authors: David G Kirsch; Daniela M Dinulescu; John B Miller; Jan Grimm; Philip M Santiago; Nathan P Young; G Petur Nielsen; Bradley J Quade; Christopher J Chaber; Christian P Schultz; Osamu Takeuchi; Roderick T Bronson; Denise Crowley; Stanley J Korsmeyer; Sam S Yoon; Francis J Hornicek; Ralph Weissleder; Tyler Jacks Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-08-05 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: J C Yang; A E Chang; A R Baker; W F Sindelar; D N Danforth; S L Topalian; T DeLaney; E Glatstein; S M Steinberg; M J Merino; S A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aileen M Davis; Brian O'Sullivan; Robert Turcotte; Robert Bell; Charles Catton; Pierre Chabot; Jay Wunder; Alex Hammond; Veronique Benk; Rita Kandel; Karen Goddard; Carolyn Freeman; Anna Sadura; Benny Zee; Andrew Day; Dongsheng Tu; Joseph Pater Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Brian O'Sullivan; Aileen M Davis; Robert Turcotte; Robert Bell; Charles Catton; Pierre Chabot; Jay Wunder; Rita Kandel; Karen Goddard; Anna Sadura; Joseph Pater; Benny Zee Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-06-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Peter W M Chung; Benjamin M Deheshi; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder; Anthony M Griffin; Charles N Catton; Robert S Bell; Lawrence M White; Rita A Kandel; Brian O'Sullivan Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jeffrey K Mito; Richard F Riedel; Leslie Dodd; Guy Lahat; Alexander J Lazar; Rebecca D Dodd; Lars Stangenberg; William C Eward; Francis J Hornicek; Sam S Yoon; Brian E Brigman; Tyler Jacks; Dina Lev; Sayan Mukherjee; David G Kirsch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Melodi Javid Whitley; Diana M Cardona; Alexander L Lazarides; Ivan Spasojevic; Jorge M Ferrer; Joan Cahill; Chang-Lung Lee; Matija Snuderl; Dan G Blazer; E Shelley Hwang; Rachel A Greenup; Paul J Mosca; Jeffrey K Mito; Kyle C Cuneo; Nicole A Larrier; Erin K O'Reilly; Richard F Riedel; William C Eward; David B Strasfeld; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain; W David Lee; Linda G Griffith; Moungi G Bawendi; David G Kirsch; Brian E Brigman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 17.956