Literature DB >> 23387518

Joint Simon effects in extrapersonal space.

Timothy N Welsh1, Dovin Kiernan, Heather F Neyedli, Matthew Ray, Jay Pratt, Andrew Potruff, Daniel J Weeks.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have revealed that when people sit next to each other and complete separate parts of a Simon task, response times are shorter when the participants' stimulus appears in front of them than when the stimulus appears in the opposite side of space. According to the action co-representation account of this joint Simon effect (JSE), participants represent each other's responses and the compatibility effects emerge because of a set of facilitatory and inhibitory processes that are similar to those that are activated when individuals perform the entire Simon task alone. D. Guagnano, E. Rusconi, and C. A. Umiltà (2010) argued against this account as the sole mechanism based on their finding that a JSE was not observed when participants sat outside of each other's peripersonal space. Notably, the task in the Guagnano et al.'s was a modified version of the conventional JSE task designed to increase the independence of the partners. Here, we reconsider the arguments of Guagnano et al. and report a study in which the authors failed to replicate their key finding. Considering the extant JSE literature, we conclude that the null effect in Guagnano et al.'s study may be an anomaly and that co-representation remains a leading candidate for the critical process underlying JSEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23387518     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.746635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  14 in total

1.  The role of the co-actor's response reachability in the joint Simon effect: remapping of working space by tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Francesca Ciardo; Simone Panajoli; Luisa Lugli; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-25

Review 2.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.

Authors:  Dovin Kiernan; Matthew Ray; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

4.  Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.

Authors:  Anouk van der Weiden; Emanuele Porcu; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; En Fu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

6.  Sequential aiming in pairs: the multiple levels of joint action.

Authors:  James W Roberts; James Maiden; Gavin P Lawrence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Interacting hands: the role of attention for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-17

8.  The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action.

Authors:  Anna Stenzel; Thomas Dolk; Lorenza S Colzato; Roberta Sellaro; Bernhard Hommel; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: empathy and friendship.

Authors:  Ruth M Ford; Bradley Aberdein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-09

Review 10.  The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Bernhard Hommel; Lorenza S Colzato; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.