Literature DB >> 25911443

Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.

Robrecht P R D van der Wel1, En Fu2.   

Abstract

A large body of work has established an influence of other people's actions on our own actions. For example, actors entrain to the movements of others, in studies that typically employ continuous movements. Likewise, studies on co-representation have shown that people automatically co-represent a co-actor's task, in studies that typically employ discrete actions. Here we examined entrainment and co-representation within a single task paradigm. Participants sat next to a confederate while simultaneously moving their right hand back and forth between two targets. We crossed whether or not the participant and the confederate moved over an obstacle and manipulated whether participants generated discrete or continuous movement sequences, while varying the space between the actors and whether the actors could see each other's movements. Participants moved higher when the confederate cleared an obstacle than when he did not. For continuous movements, this effect depended on the availability of visual information, as would be expected on the basis of entrainment. In contrast, the co-actor's task modulated the height of discrete movements, regardless of the availability of visual information, which is consistent with co-representation. Space did not have an effect. These results provide new insights into the interplay between co-representation and entrainment for discrete- and continuous-action tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-representation; Coordination; Joint action; Perception–action coupling

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25911443     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0831-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete.

Authors:  Stefan Schaal; Dagmar Sternad; Rieko Osu; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-26       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task.

Authors:  Chia-Chin Tsai; Wen-Jui Kuo; Jung-Tai Jing; Daisy L Hung; Ovid J-L Tzeng
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Horsing around: spontaneous four-legged coordination.

Authors:  Steven J Harrison; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination.

Authors:  Michael J Richardson; Kerry L Marsh; R C Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Robin M Fleckenstein; Steven A Jax; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation?

Authors:  Timothy N Welsh; Laura Higgins; Matthew Ray; Daniel J Weeks
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control.

Authors:  Neville Hogan; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination.

Authors:  Cordula Vesper; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Günther Knoblich; Natalie Sebanz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Different corticospinal control between discrete and rhythmic movement of the ankle.

Authors:  Yumeno Goto; Yasutomo Jono; Ryota Hatanaka; Yoshifumi Nomura; Keisuke Tani; Yuta Chujo; Koichi Hiraoka
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: hand-centred effects.

Authors:  Debra Griffiths; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sequential aiming in pairs: the multiple levels of joint action.

Authors:  James W Roberts; James Maiden; Gavin P Lawrence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Moving higher and higher: imitators' movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality.

Authors:  Paul A G Forbes; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-25

4.  Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.

Authors:  Laura Schmitz; Cordula Vesper; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-08-22

5.  The influence of prior intention on joint action: an fNIRS-based hyperscanning study.

Authors:  Yixin Chen; Qihan Zhang; Sheng Yuan; Bingjie Zhao; Peng Zhang; Xuejun Bai
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 3.436

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.