Literature DB >> 23386922

Fee-for-service as a business model of growing importance: the academic biobank experience.

Sandra A McDonald, Kara Sommerkamp, Maureen Egan-Palmer, Karen Kharasch, Victoria Holtschlag.   

Abstract

Biorepositories offer tremendous scientific value to a wide variety of customer groups (academic, commercial, industrial) in their ability to deliver a centralized, standardized service model, encompassing both biospecimen storage and related laboratory services. Generally, the scientific expertise and economies of scale that are offered in centralized, properly resourced research biobanks has yielded value that has been well-recognized by universities, pharmaceutical companies, and other sponsoring institutions. However, like many facets of the economy, biobanks have been under increasing cost pressure in recent years. This has been a particular problem in the academic arena, where direct support from grant sources (both governmental and philanthropic) typically now is more difficult to secure, or provides reduced financial support, relative to previous years. One way to address this challenge is to establish or enhance a well-defined fee-for-service model which is properly calibrated to cover operational costs while still offering competitive value to users. In this model, customers are never charged for the biospecimens themselves, but rather for the laboratory services associated with them. Good communication practices, proper assessment of value, implementation of best practices, and a sound business plan are all needed for this initiative to succeed. Here we summarize our experiences at Washington University School of Medicine in the expectation they will be useful to others.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23386922      PMCID: PMC3562471          DOI: 10.1089/bio.2012.0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  5 in total

1.  Principles of Research Tissue Banking and Specimen Evaluation from the Pathologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Sandra A McDonald
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Automated Web-Based Request Mechanism for Workflow Enhancement in an Academic Customer-Focused Biorepository.

Authors:  Sandra A McDonald; Benjamin J Ryan; Amy Brink; Victoria L Holtschlag
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Biobankonomics: a taxonomy for evaluating the economic benefits of standardized centralized human biobanking for translational research.

Authors:  Joyce Rogers; Todd Carolin; Jimmie Vaught; Carolyn Compton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2011

4.  A new paradigm for biospecimen banking in the personalized medicine era.

Authors:  Sandra A McDonald; Mark A Watson; Joan Rossi; Colleen M Becker; David P Jaques; John D Pfeifer
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Procurement of Human Tissues for Research Banking in the Surgical Pathology Laboratory: Prioritization Practices at Washington University Medical Center.

Authors:  Sandra A McDonald; Rebecca D Chernock; Tracey A Leach; Ajaz A Kahn; James H Yip; Joan Rossi; John D Pfeifer
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.300

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability.

Authors:  Hana Odeh; Lisa Miranda; Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Howard Greenman; Jeffrey McLean; Daniel Reed; Sarfraz Memon; Benjamin Fombonne; Ping Guan; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Sustainability in Biobanking.

Authors:  Maram Abdaljaleel; Elyse J Singer; William H Yong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

3.  A Plan for Academic Biobank Solvency-Leveraging Resources and Applying Business Processes to Improve Sustainability.

Authors:  Diane Uzarski; James Burke; Barbara Turner; James Vroom; Nancy Short
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  Trends in Biobanking Business Planning: Initial Results of a Survey of Biobankers.

Authors:  Daniel Simeon-Dubach; Kirstin Goldring; Marianne K Henderson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  The Evolution of a Large Biobank at Mass General Brigham.

Authors:  Natalie T Boutin; Samantha B Schecter; Emma F Perez; Natasha S Tchamitchian; Xander R Cerretani; Vivian S Gainer; Matthew S Lebo; Lisa M Mahanta; Elizabeth W Karlson; Jordan W Smoller
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.