Literature DB >> 23385994

Learning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors.

N Hannaford1, C Mandel, C Crock, K Buckley, F Magrabi, M Ong, S Allen, T Schultz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the type and nature of incidents occurring within medical imaging settings in Australia and identify strategies that could be engaged to reduce the risk of their re-occurrence.
METHODS: 71 search terms, related to clinical handover and communication, were applied to 3976 incidents in the Radiology Events Register. Detailed classification and thematic analysis of a subset of incidents that involved handover or communication (n=298) were undertaken to identify the most prevalent types of error and to make recommendations about patient safety initiatives in medical imaging.
RESULTS: Incidents occurred most frequently during patient preparation (34%), when requesting imaging (27%) and when communicating a diagnosis (23%). Frequent problems within each of these stages of the imaging cycle included: inadequate handover of patients (41%) or unsafe or inappropriate transfer of the patient to or from medical imaging (35%); incorrect information on the request form (52%); and delayed communication of a diagnosis (36%) or communication of a wrong diagnosis (36%).
CONCLUSION: The handover of patients and clinical information to and from medical imaging is fraught with error, often compromising patient safety and resulting in communication of delayed or wrong diagnoses, unnecessary radiation exposure and a waste of limited resources. Corrective strategies to address safety concerns related to new information technologies, patient transfer and inadequate test result notification policies are relevant to all healthcare settings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Handover and communication errors are prevalent in medical imaging. System-wide changes that facilitate effective communication are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23385994      PMCID: PMC3608041          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20120336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  30 in total

1.  When conversation is better than computation.

Authors:  E Coiera
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference.

Authors:  D L Renfrew; E A Franken; K S Berbaum; F H Weigelt; M M Abu-Yousef
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Inter-observer agreement in audit of quality of radiology requests and reports.

Authors:  K Stavem; T Foss; O Botnmark; O K Andersen; J Erikssen
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Error in medicine.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects.

Authors:  L Lingard; S Espin; S Whyte; G Regehr; G R Baker; R Reznick; J Bohnen; B Orser; D Doran; E Grober
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

6.  The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care.

Authors:  M Leonard; S Graham; D Bonacum
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

7.  Incidents relating to the intra-hospital transfer of critically ill patients. An analysis of the reports submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care.

Authors:  Ursula Beckmann; Donna M Gillies; Sean M Berenholtz; Albert W Wu; Peter Pronovost
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Deterioration of respiratory function after intra-hospital transport of critically ill surgical patients.

Authors:  C Waydhas; G Schneck; K H Duswald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Factors that contribute to complications during intrahospital transport of the critically ill.

Authors:  B L Doring; M E Kerr; D A Lovasik; T Thayer
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.230

Review 10.  Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners' diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.

Authors:  Pavel S Roshanov; John J You; Jasmine Dhaliwal; David Koff; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gauging potential risk for patients in pediatric radiology by review of over 2,000 incident reports.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Snyder; Wei Zhang; Kimberly Chua Jasmin; Sam Thankachan; Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-29

2.  Identification of quality improvement areas in pediatric MRI from analysis of patient safety reports.

Authors:  Camilo Jaimes; Diana J Murcia; Karen Miguel; Cathryn DeFuria; Pallavi Sagar; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-19

3.  The variables perceived to be important during patient handover by South African prehospital care providers.

Authors:  Andrew William Makkink; Christopher Owen Alexander Stein; Stevan Raynier Bruijns; Sean Gottschalk
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-08

4.  Detecting Patient Safety Errors by Characterizing Incidents Reported by Medical Imaging Staff.

Authors:  Tarja Tarkiainen; Sami Sneck; Marianne Haapea; Miia Turpeinen; Jaakko Niinimäki
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18

5.  Current challenges and future perspectives for patient safety in surgery.

Authors:  Philip F Stahel; Cyril Mauffrey; Nathan Butler
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-02-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.