Literature DB >> 14991102

Incidents relating to the intra-hospital transfer of critically ill patients. An analysis of the reports submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care.

Ursula Beckmann1, Donna M Gillies, Sean M Berenholtz, Albert W Wu, Peter Pronovost.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transportation of critically ill patients within the hospital poses important risks. We sought to identify causes, outcomes and contributing factors associated with intra-hospital transport.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional case review.
SETTING: Incident reports submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care (AIMS-ICU). MEASUREMENT AND MAIN
RESULTS: Between 1993 and 1999, 176 reports were submitted describing 191 incidents. Seventy-five reports (39%) identified equipment problems, relating prominently to battery/power supply, transport ventilator and monitor function, access to patient elevators and intubation equipment. Hundred sixteen reports (61%) identified patient/staff management issues including poor communication, inadequate monitoring, incorrect set-up of equipment, artificial airway malpositioning and incorrect positioning of patients. Serious adverse outcomes occurred in 55 reports (31%) including major physiological derangement (15%), patient/relative dissatisfaction (7%), prolonged hospital stay (4%), physical/psychological injury (3%) and death (2%). Of 900 contributing factors identified, 46% were system-based and 54% human-based. Communication problems, inadequate protocols, in-servicing/training and equipment were prominent equipment-related incidents. Errors of problem recognition and judgement, failure to follow protocols, inadequate patient preparation, haste and inattention were common management-related incidents. Rechecking the patient and equipment, skilled assistance and prior experience were important factors limiting harm.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-hospital transport poses an important risk to ICU patients. The adequate provision of highly qualified staff, specially designed and well maintained equipment, as well as continuous monitoring are essential to avoid/mitigate these incidents. Professional societies and local units should adopt guidelines/protocols for intra-hospital transportation. Monitoring of incidents should aid in the continuous improvement in patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991102     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2177-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  43 in total

1.  Bedside procedures. Solutions to the pitfalls of intrahospital transport.

Authors:  M T Haupt; C G Rehm
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Intrahospital transport of the critically ill adult: a research review and implications.

Authors:  M Caruana; K Culp
Journal:  Dimens Crit Care Nurs       Date:  1998 May-Jun

3.  The effects of secondary transport on critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Ridley; R Carter
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care: AIMS-ICU. The development and evaluation of an incident reporting system in intensive care.

Authors:  U Beckmann; L F West; G J Groombridge; I Baldwin; G K Hart; D G Clayton; R K Webb; W B Runciman
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.669

5.  Guidelines for the transfer of critically ill patients. Guidelines Committee of the American College of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Transfer Guidelines Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Guidelines for the transfer of critically ill patients. Guidelines Committee, American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Transfer Guidelines Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Cost and complications during in-hospital transport of critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  J M Hurst; K Davis; D J Johnson; R D Branson; R S Campbell; P S Branson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-10

8.  Electrocardiographic changes in critically ill adults during intrahospital transport.

Authors:  K J Carson; B J Drew
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  1994

9.  Validation of a prognostic score in critically ill patients undergoing transport.

Authors:  J F Bion; S A Edlin; G Ramsay; S McCabe; I M Ledingham
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-17

10.  High-risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary "road trip".

Authors:  J W Szem; L J Hydo; E Fischer; S Kapur; J Klemperer; P S Barie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  103 in total

1.  Clinical Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients Using Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) during Intrahospital Transport.

Authors:  Leonid Koyfman; Omri Simchon; Anna Koyfman; Shoshana Mushaev; Benjamin F Gruenbaum; Ron Gal; Michael Friger; Natan Arotsker; Alexander Zlotnik; Moti Klein; Evgeni Brotfain
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2021-05-05

2.  Intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients: minimising risk.

Authors:  Peter J Shirley; Julian F Bion
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Noa Segall; Alberto S Bonifacio; Rebecca A Schroeder; Atilio Barbeito; Dawn Rogers; Deirdre K Thornlow; James Emery; Sally Kellum; Melanie C Wright; Jonathan B Mark
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  [Occurrence and prevention of errors in intensive care units].

Authors:  A Valentin
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 5.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 6.  Medication errors in critical care: risk factors, prevention and disclosure.

Authors:  Eric Camiré; Eric Moyen; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Lung ultrasonography as a direct measure of evolving respiratory dysfunction and disease severity in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Christos Skouras; Zoe A Davis; Joanne Sharkey; Rowan W Parks; O James Garden; John T Murchison; Damian J Mole
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Learning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors.

Authors:  N Hannaford; C Mandel; C Crock; K Buckley; F Magrabi; M Ong; S Allen; T Schultz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Chest radiography in intensive care: an irreplaceable survey?

Authors:  V Palazzetti; E Gasparri; C Gambini; S Sollazzo; S Saric; L Salvolini; A Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Benoît Fanara; Cyril Manzon; Olivier Barbot; Thibaut Desmettre; Gilles Capellier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.