Literature DB >> 1549661

Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference.

D L Renfrew1, E A Franken, K S Berbaum, F H Weigelt, M M Abu-Yousef.   

Abstract

The authors review and classify errors in 182 cases that were presented at problem case conferences between August 1986 and October 1990. Errors were classified by means of a system developed 20 years ago and by means of a system developed within the past several years. The authors found that sources of error have changed very little. Errors usually involved failure to consult old radiologic studies or reports, limitations in imaging technique, acquisition of inaccurate or incomplete clinical history, location of a lesion outside the area of interest on an image, lack of knowledge, failure to continue to search for abnormalities after the first abnormality was found, and failure to recognize a normal biologic variant. Errors included 126 perceptual errors (64 false-negative, 15 false-positive, and 47 misclassification errors) and 56 mishaps, including 38 complications and 18 communication errors. In seven cases nonperception errors occurred because established departmental routines were not followed, and in nine cases a new departmental routine was established after a complication occurred. Departmental policy exerts less effect on perception and interpretation errors.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549661     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  Diagnostic errors in pediatric radiology.

Authors:  George A Taylor; Stephan D Voss; Patrice R Melvin; Dionne A Graham
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-09-09

2.  Early experience using an online reporting system for interventional radiology procedure-related complications integrated with a digital dictation system.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Jay Patel; Kevin McEnery; Michael J Wallace; Kamran Ahrar; Chuck Suitor; Marshall E Hicks
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Reducing error in radiographic interpretation.

Authors:  Kate Alexander
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

5.  Reporting instructions significantly impact false positive rates when reading chest radiographs.

Authors:  John W Robinson; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Sarah J Lewis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Overnight resident preliminary interpretations on CT examinations: should the process continue?

Authors:  William M Strub; Achala A Vagal; Thomas Tomsick; Jonathan S Moulton
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-07-25

7.  Interrater variation in scoring radiological discrepancies.

Authors:  B Mucci; H Murray; A Downie; K Osborne
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Frequency and cause of disagreements in diagnoses for fetuses referred for ventriculomegaly.

Authors:  Deborah Levine; Henry A Feldman; João F Kazan Tannus; Judy A Estroff; Melissa Magnino; Caroline D Robson; Tina Y Poussaint; Carol E Barnewolt; Tejas S Mehta; Richard L Robertson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Learning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors.

Authors:  N Hannaford; C Mandel; C Crock; K Buckley; F Magrabi; M Ong; S Allen; T Schultz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.