Literature DB >> 23385989

The effect of pressure and shear on autologous fat grafting.

Jeffrey H Lee1, John C Kirkham, Michael C McCormack, Alexa M Nicholls, Mark A Randolph, William G Austen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fat grafting has become routine in plastic surgery because of low donor-site morbidity, a low complication rate, and fast recovery time. The optimal technique, however, has yet to be defined. Two critical variables are pressure and shear, both defined as force divided by area. In this study, the authors examined the effect of pressure and shear on human fat grafts in a nude mouse model.
METHODS: For negative pressure, tumescent liposuction was performed on fresh panniculectomy specimens. Suction pressure was either -15 inHg or -25 inHg. Lipoaspirate was centrifuged at 1200 g and injected into the flanks of nude mice. For positive pressure, positive pressure was applied to lipoaspirate up to 6 atm for up to 3 minutes and then injected into nude mice. For shear stress, lipoaspirate was centrifuged at 1200 g for 3 minutes and then injected with a fast flow rate (3 to 5 cc/second) or slow flow rate (0.5 to 1 cc/second). After 4 weeks, the fat grafts were analyzed for weight and histology.
RESULTS: For negative pressure, there were no differences in weight or histology with high versus low suction pressures. For positive pressure, application of positive pressures up to 6 atm for up to 3 minutes did not create a significant difference in graft weight or histology at 4 weeks. For shear stress, in vivo, a slow injection pressure yielded a 38 percent increase in weight (p < 0.001) compared with fast injection. Histology was similarly affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher aspiration pressures up to -0.83 atm did not affect fat graft viability in vivo. Positive pressure up to 6 atm also did not affect fat graft viability. The degree of shear stress, which is a function of flow rate, did significantly affect fat graft viability. Fat grafts injected slowly with low shear stress significantly outperformed fat injected with high shear stress. These data suggest that shear stress is a more important variable regarding fat graft viability than pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23385989     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182879f4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  25 in total

Review 1.  The Influence of High and Low Negative Pressure Liposuction and Various Harvesting Techniques on the Viability and Function of Harvested Cells-a Systematic Review of Animal and Human Studies.

Authors:  Martin Molitor; Martina Trávníčková; Ondřej Měšťák; Petros Christodoulou; Antonín Sedlář; Lucie Bačáková; Stefano Lucchina
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  Fat grafting and breast reconstruction: tips for ensuring predictability.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Manish C Champaneria; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

3.  Fat Grafting into Younger Recipients Improves Volume Retention in an Animal Model.

Authors:  Natalie N Chung; Ryan C Ransom; Charles P Blackshear; Dre M Irizarry; Derek Yen; Arash Momeni; Gordon K Lee; Dung H Nguyen; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Autologous Fat Grafting: The Science Behind the Surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Zielins; Elizabeth A Brett; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Invited Discussion on: Forehead Contouring as an Adjunct to Rhinoplasty: Evaluation of the Effect on Facial Appearance, Personal Traits and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Barış Çakır; Erhan Coşkun
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 6.  Assessment of the Causes of Differences in Centrifugation Protocols as a Fat-Processing Technique: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Oguzhan Demirel; Funda Aköz Saydam
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 7.  Fat Grafting for Facial Rejuvenation.

Authors:  Kelly P Schultz; Anjali Raghuram; Matthew J Davis; Amjed Abu-Ghname; Edward Chamata; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  Assessment of viability of human fat injection into nude mice with micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  David A Atashroo; Kevin J Paik; Michael T Chung; Adrian McArdle; Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Elizabeth R Zielins; Ruth Tevlin; Christopher R Duldulao; Graham G Walmsley; Taylor Wearda; Owen Marecic; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  [Autologous fat grafting in breast surgery : results of a retrospective study].

Authors:  E Russe; T Schöller; H Hussl; P Pülzl; H Reichl; F Ensat; M Hladik; G Wechselberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Studies in fat grafting: Part I. Effects of injection technique on in vitro fat viability and in vivo volume retention.

Authors:  Michael T Chung; Kevin J Paik; David A Atashroo; Jeong S Hyun; Adrian McArdle; Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Elizabeth R Zielins; Ruth Tevlin; Chris Duldulao; Michael S Hu; Graham G Walmsley; Andreina Parisi-Amon; Arash Momeni; Joe R Rimsa; George W Commons; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.