Literature DB >> 23380958

Analysis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and optimal timing for prophylactic use of G-CSF in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP.

Hisaharu Shikata1, Yoshihiro Yakushijin, Jun Yamanouchi, Taichi Azuma, Masaki Yasukawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the serious complications of chemotherapy. However, the hematological nadir after chemotherapy and the timing of prophylaxis for FN remain unclear, especially for outpatients.
METHODS: We prospectively analyzed laboratory data from outpatients treated with a single chemotherapy regimen, rituximab (R)-CHOP, on three consultation days (days 8, 10, and 15) after chemotherapy to identify any factors that might predict the onset of the hematological nadir and the optimal timing of G-CSF prophylaxis.
RESULTS: A total of 100 courses of chemotherapy (total 33 patients) were analyzed. Onset of the hematological nadir was not predictable in any of the patients who had a white blood cell count (WBC) of >5,500 × 10(6)/L and/or monocyte count of >80 × 10(6)/L on day 8, and thus there was little opportunity for G-CSF prophylaxis in each treatment course. Among patients who had a WBC count of 1,500-5,500 × 10(6)/L on day 8, the monocyte count on day 8 was significantly associated with the hematological nadir. Patients who had a monocyte count of <5 × 10(6)/L on day 8, were identified as a high-risk group for neutropenia for whom G-CSF administration during the current treatment course should be considered.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that, in outpatients receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy, the monocyte count on day 8 is a useful marker of the hematological nadir, allowing an opportunity for G-CSF prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23380958     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-013-0523-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  25 in total

1.  Usage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor every 2 days is clinically useful and cost-effective for febrile neutropenia during early courses of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yakushijin; Hisaharu Shikata; Ikue Takaoka; Tamami Horikawa; Kazuhito Takeuchi; Jun Yamanouchi; Taichi Azuma; Hiroshi Narumi; Takaaki Hato; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (1).

Authors:  G J Lieschke; A W Burgess
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Polypeptides controlling hematopoietic cell development and activation. I. In vitro results.

Authors:  F Herrmann; R Mertelsmann
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1989-03

4.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and its receptor.

Authors:  G D Demetri; J D Griffin
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  In vivo hematologic effects of recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  T R Ulich; J del Castillo; L R Watson; S M Yin; M B Garnick
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Single dose of filgrastim (rhG-CSF) increases the number of hematopoietic progenitors in the peripheral blood of adult volunteers.

Authors:  W Schwinger; C Mache; C Urban; F Beaufort; W Töglhofer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Use of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to support delivery of chemotherapy: twenty years of clinical experience.

Authors:  William Renwick; Ruth Pettengell; Michael Green
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 10.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictive value of monocytes and lymphocytes for short-term neutrophil changes in chemotherapy-induced severe neutropenia in solid tumors.

Authors:  Buhong Zheng; Zhiyu Huang; Yunxia Huang; Liang Hong; Jinluan Li; Junxin Wu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Effectiveness and safety of combined therapy versus monotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or targeted drugs as salvage treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lichao Wei; Liang Gao; Zili Hu; Chuan Liu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.