Literature DB >> 19627169

Use of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to support delivery of chemotherapy: twenty years of clinical experience.

William Renwick1, Ruth Pettengell, Michael Green.   

Abstract

Neutropenia is a serious hematologic toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The discovery that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could stimulate the production of neutrophils was followed by the purification and molecular cloning of filgrastim (Neupogen), the human recombinant form of the protein, between 1984 and 1986. In this article, we review 20 years of clinical literature with filgrastim and the more recent experience with pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) to support the delivery of chemotherapy. The earliest clinical studies of filgrastim showed that it produces immediate transient leukopenia followed by a sustained, dose-dependent increase in circulating neutrophils. In the two registrational studies of filgrastim, the cumulative incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was reduced by about 50% compared with placebo. Subsequent clinical trials and meta-analyses established that primary prophylaxis with filgrastim (beginning in the first cycle of chemotherapy) reduced the incidence of FN, FN-related hospitalizations, intravenous anti-infective use, infection-related mortality, and the need for chemotherapy dose modification, compared with placebo or no treatment, in many tumor types. Pegfilgrastim, formed by the addition of a polyethylene glycol molecule to filgrastim, has comparable efficacy to filgrastim when administered only once per chemotherapy cycle. High-level evidence indicates that both filgrastim and pegfilgrastim improve the likelihood of completing dose-dense and dose-intense chemotherapy. The most recent guidelines from three international cancer organizations, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network, are in agreement that filgrastim or pegfilgrastim should be given prophylactically when the risk of FN with a chemotherapy regimen is > or =20%, or when the risk is 10-20% and the patient has other risk factors for FN. The development of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim has revolutionized oncology practice. Prophylactic use of these agents has enabled development of more aggressive chemotherapy regimens, including dose-dense chemotherapy, and treatment of a broader range of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19627169     DOI: 10.2165/00063030-200923030-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioDrugs        ISSN: 1173-8804            Impact factor:   5.807


  16 in total

Review 1.  Clinical developments in nanotechnology for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jeremy D Heidel; Mark E Davis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Uptake of novel medical therapies in the general population.

Authors:  C M Booth; B Rapoport
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  A modified filgrastim regimen does not reduce pain burden compared to pegfilgrastim in women receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Mova Leung; Joy Florendo; Jessica Kano; Tiffany Marr-Del Monte; Brian Higgins; Robert Myers; Trishala Menon; Glenn Jones
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  The colony-stimulating factors and cancer.

Authors:  Donald Metcalf
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Comparison of pegfilgrastim on day 2 vs. day 4 as primary prophylaxis of intense dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with node-positive primary breast cancer within the prospective, multi-center GAIN study: (GBG 33).

Authors:  Sibylle Loibl; Volkmar Mueller; Gunter von Minckwitz; Bettina Conrad; Claus-Henning Koehne; Stephan Kremers; Helmut Forstbauer; Mattea Linder; Valentina Nekljudova; Volker Moebus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Health-related quality of life anticipated with different management strategies for febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

Authors:  O Teuffel; S Cheng; M C Ethier; C Diorio; J Martino; C Mayo; R Wing; L Sung; S M H Alibhai
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Analysis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and optimal timing for prophylactic use of G-CSF in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP.

Authors:  Hisaharu Shikata; Yoshihiro Yakushijin; Jun Yamanouchi; Taichi Azuma; Masaki Yasukawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Regulator of G-protein signaling-21 (RGS21) is an inhibitor of bitter gustatory signaling found in lingual and airway epithelia.

Authors:  Staci P Cohen; Brian K Buckley; Mickey Kosloff; Alaina L Garland; Dustin E Bosch; Gang Cheng; Harish Radhakrishna; Michael D Brown; Francis S Willard; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Robert Tarran; David P Siderovski; Adam J Kimple
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Assessing the impact of a targeted electronic medical record intervention on the use of growth factor in cancer patients.

Authors:  Jordan N Bernens; Kara Hartman; Brendan Curley; Sijin Wen; Jane Rogers; Jame Abraham; Michael Newton
Journal:  J Community Support Oncol       Date:  2015-03

10.  Fulminate anaerobic bacteremia after chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer despite the prophylactic use of GCSF.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Zhasmina Mihaylova; Albena Fakirova
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2010-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.