Literature DB >> 23377716

Cervical cancer screening preferences among African American women in the Mississippi Delta.

Allison G Litton1, Philip E Castle, Edward E Partridge, Isabel C Scarinci.   

Abstract

Although cervical cancer screening rates have increased in the United States, there are still geographic areas that experience a high cervical cancer burden, including the Mississippi Delta. Human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection may be a feasible alternative to traditional clinician-collection for cervical cancer screening for under-screened women. This study examined women's preferences for cervical cancer screening methods. Interviewer-administered questionnaires regarding cervical cancer screening preferences were completed by 524 African American women in the Mississippi Delta. Statistically significant differences were observed for age, employment status, and number of children across recruitment groups. Regardless of how women were recruited, the majority preferred self-sampling for HPV testing method to clinician-collection. Among women who preferred self-collected sampling for HPV testing, the most frequent reasons given were convenience, privacy, and comfort. Alternative strategies must be considered when targeting the under-screened to reduce the burden of cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23377716     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  9 in total

Review 1.  Acceptability, Feasibility and Uptake of HPV Self-Sampling Among Immigrant Minority Women: a Focused Literature Review.

Authors:  Sarah Marshall; Mandana Vahabi; Aisha Lofters
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-12

2.  Perceptions of mailed HPV self-testing among women at higher risk for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kayoll V Galbraith; Melissa B Gilkey; Jennifer S Smith; Alice R Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-10

3.  Reactions of women underscreened for cervical cancer who received unsolicited human papillomavirus self-sampling kits.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Jasmin A Tiro; Diana Sm Buist; Tara Beatty; John Lin; Kilian Kimbel; Hongyuan Gao; Chris Thayer; Diana L Miglioretti; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 4.  Variation in Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences among Medically Underserved Individuals in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Meghan C O'Leary; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa P Spees
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Preference for Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection and Papanicolaou: Survey of Underscreened Women in North Carolina.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kilfoyle; Andrea C Des Marais; Mai Anh Ngo; LaHoma Romocki; Alice R Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Lisa Rahangdale; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Assessing Acceptability of Self-Sampling Kits, Prevalence, and Risk Factors for Human Papillomavirus Infection in American Indian Women.

Authors:  Rachel L Winer; Angela A Gonzales; Carolyn J Noonan; Stephen L Cherne; Dedra S Buchwald
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-10

7.  An empirical study of the 'underscreened' in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates.

Authors:  Jane H Williams; Stacy M Carter
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.

Authors:  Ingeborg Zehbe; Pamela Wakewich; Amy-Dee King; Kyla Morrisseau; Candace Tuck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A conjoint analysis study on self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing characteristics among black women in Indiana.

Authors:  Erika Biederman; Victoria Champion; Gregory Zimet
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.