Literature DB >> 23375648

Response to induction chemotherapy and surgery in non-organ confined bladder cancer: a single institution experience.

R P Meijer1, J A Nieuwenhuijzen, W Meinhardt, A Bex, H G van der Poel, B W van Rhijn, J M Kerst, A M Bergman, E van Werkhoven, S Horenblas.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the outcome of patients with locally advanced muscle-invasive and/or lymph node positive bladder cancer treated with induction chemotherapy and additional surgery.
METHODS: All patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy in our institution between 1990 and 2010, were retrospectively evaluated using an institutional database. Induction chemotherapy consisted of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC), or a combination of gemcitabine with either cisplatin or carboplatin (GC).
RESULTS: In total 152 patients were identified, with a mean age of 59 years (range 31-76). One hundred and seven patients (70.4%) received MVAC, 35 patients received GC (23.0%) and 10 patients received GC after initial treatment with MVAC (6.6%). Median follow-up was 68 months (range 4-187 months). Overall 125 patients (82.2%) underwent cystectomy, whereas 12 patients (7.9%) received radiotherapy. Fifteen patients had no local treatment. Median overall survival was 18 months (95%CI 15-23 months). In 37.5% of patients with complete clinical response, residual disease was found at surgery (positive predictive value, PPV 62.5%). Complete pathological response was seen in 26.3% of patients, with a 5 year overall survival (OS) estimate of 54% (39%-74%). For patients with persisting node positive disease after induction chemotherapy and surgery OS was significantly worse (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Complete clinical and/or pathological response to induction chemotherapy results in a significant survival benefit. The accuracy of the current clinical response evaluation after induction chemotherapy is limited. Although surgery may be important for staging and prognostic purposes, its role is unclear in node positive disease after induction chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23375648     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  12 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Two-Step Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ming Yin; Monika Joshi; Richard P Meijer; Michael Glantz; Sheldon Holder; Harold A Harvey; Matthew Kaag; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Simon Horenblas; Joseph J Drabick
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-04-06

2.  Neoadjuvant induction dose-dense MVAC for muscle invasive bladder cancer: efficacy and safety compared with classic MVAC and gemcitabine/cisplatin.

Authors:  Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Laura S Mertens; Richard P Meijer; Michiel S van der Heijden; Axel Bex; Henk G van der Poel; J Martijn Kerst; Andries M Bergman; Simon Horenblas; Bas W G van Rhijn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Homayoun Zargar; Patrick N Espiritu; Adrian S Fairey; Laura S Mertens; Colin P Dinney; Maria C Mir; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Michael S Cookson; Niels-Erik Jacobsen; Nilay M Gandhi; Joshua Griffin; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Nikhil Vasdev; Evan Y Yu; David Youssef; Evanguelos Xylinas; Nicholas J Campain; Wassim Kassouf; Marc A Dall'Era; Jo-An Seah; Cesar E Ercole; Simon Horenblas; Srikala S Sridhar; John S McGrath; Jonathan Aning; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jonathan L Wright; Andrew C Thorpe; Todd M Morgan; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Scott North; Daniel A Barocas; Yair Lotan; Jorge A Garcia; Andrew J Stephenson; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Dose dense MVAC prior to radical cystectomy: a real-world experience.

Authors:  Homayoun Zargar; Jay B Shah; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Kylea R Potvin; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Philippe E Spiess; Eric Winquist; Simon Horenblas; Colin Dinney; Peter C Black; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The Role of Surgery in Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Abufaraj; Guido Dalbagni; Siamak Daneshmand; Simon Horenblas; Ashish M Kamat; Ryu Kanzaki; Alexandre R Zlotta; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons.

Authors:  Samuel A Funt; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  FDG-PET/CT for response evaluation of invasive bladder cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  E E Fransen van de Putte; E Vegt; L S Mertens; A Bruining; K Hendricksen; M S van der Heijden; S Horenblas; B W G van Rhijn
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Management of muscle invasive, locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a literature review with emphasis on the role of surgery.

Authors:  Mohammad Abufaraj; Kilian Gust; Marco Moschini; Beat Foerster; Francesco Soria; Romain Mathieu; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

Review 9.  Role of surgical consolidation in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Takashige Abe; Ryuji Matsumoto; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of chemotherapy treatment in patients with muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Daan J Reesink; Ewoudt M W van de Garde; Bas J M Peters; Paul B van der Nat; Maartje Los; Simon Horenblas; Harm H E van Melick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.