Khalid M Khan1, Sydney S Evans1, Sylvanna L Bielko1, Diane S Rohlman2. 1. a Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health , Indiana University , Bloomington , IN , USA and. 2. b Occupational and Environmental Health , College of Public Health, The University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:Adolescent farmworkers are exposed to loud noise during farm activities. We present a prospective study that evaluated the efficacy of low-cost, technology-based intervention approaches in high schools to enhance the use of hearing protection among adolescent farmworkers. DESIGN:Six high schools in Iowa that agreed to participate in the study were divided into three equal groups through cluster-randomisation with each group receiving one of the three formats of hearing protection intervention: (a) classroom training, (b) classroom training coupled with smartphone app training and (c) computer training. Participants completed baseline (pre-training) and six-week post-intervention surveys for assessing hearing protection knowledge, attitudes and behaviour. STUDY SAMPLE: Seventy participants from six schools were initially enrolled but 50 completed both pre- and post-intervention surveys. RESULTS: In most cases, all three groups showed significant improvement in hearing protection knowledge, attitude and frequency of use from pre- to post-intervention. However, changes between groups were statistically non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although all three formats led to improvements on hearing protection knowledge, attitude and behaviour, the findings of the study, perhaps due to the small sample size, did not allow us to detect whether technology-based hearing protection interventions were more effective than the traditional face-to-face training for adolescent farmworkers.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Adolescent farmworkers are exposed to loud noise during farm activities. We present a prospective study that evaluated the efficacy of low-cost, technology-based intervention approaches in high schools to enhance the use of hearing protection among adolescent farmworkers. DESIGN: Six high schools in Iowa that agreed to participate in the study were divided into three equal groups through cluster-randomisation with each group receiving one of the three formats of hearing protection intervention: (a) classroom training, (b) classroom training coupled with smartphone app training and (c) computer training. Participants completed baseline (pre-training) and six-week post-intervention surveys for assessing hearing protection knowledge, attitudes and behaviour. STUDY SAMPLE: Seventy participants from six schools were initially enrolled but 50 completed both pre- and post-intervention surveys. RESULTS: In most cases, all three groups showed significant improvement in hearing protection knowledge, attitude and frequency of use from pre- to post-intervention. However, changes between groups were statistically non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although all three formats led to improvements on hearing protection knowledge, attitude and behaviour, the findings of the study, perhaps due to the small sample size, did not allow us to detect whether technology-based hearing protection interventions were more effective than the traditional face-to-face training for adolescent farmworkers.
Authors: Melissa F Peskin; Ross Shegog; Christine M Markham; Melanie Thiel; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Efrat K Gabay; Susan Tortolero Emery Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Michael F McTague; Deron Galusha; Christine Dixon-Ernst; Sharon R Kirsche; Martin D Slade; Mark R Cullen; Peter M Rabinowitz Journal: Int J Audiol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: Leslie B Hammer; Donald M Truxillo; Todd Bodner; Jennifer Rineer; Amy C Pytlovany; Amy Richman Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Dahui Wang; Chenhui Li; Yi Wang; Shichang Wang; Shuang Wu; Shiyan Zhang; Liangwen Xu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Melissa D Olfert; Makenzie L Barr; Rebecca L Hagedorn; Dustin M Long; Treah S Haggerty; Mathew Weimer; Joseph Golden; Mary Ann Maurer; Jill D Cochran; Tracy Hendershot; Stacey L Whanger; Jay D Mason; Sally L Hodder Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2019-11-20