Literature DB >> 16581094

How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?

Veronica Mazza1, Massimo Turatto, Martina Rossi, Carlo Umiltà.   

Abstract

Three experiments on healthy humans investigated the degree of automaticity of crossmodal spatial attention shifts by assessing the intentionality criterion. We used the orthogonal cuing paradigm in which a lateralized cue, either visual or auditory was followed by a unimodal or crossmodal target that occurred at the same or opposite side. In all experiments, the cue was always uninformative as to target location. In Experiment 1, where both side and modality of targets were unpredictable, we found faster discriminations for visual targets following uninformative auditory cues on the same side. This result was replicated in Experiment 2, where target side was blocked and participants could orient attention in advance toward the appropriate side, and in Experiment 3, where they were additionally informed about target modality. Our results suggest that this sort of crossmodal orienting is automatic because it occurred even when participants were provided with detailed information about the target to prevent uninformative auditory cues from orienting attention. This is consistent with the notion that peripheral auditory stimuli are very powerful in capturing visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16581094     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Competition between auditory and visual spatial cues during visual task performance.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adelbert Bronkhorst; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Cristy Ho; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

3.  The interplay of cue modality and response latency in brain areas supporting crossmodal motor preparation: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Zainab Fatima; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Which factors are important for crossmodal attentional effect?

Authors:  L L Righi; L E Ribeiro-do-Valle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Diffusion tensor imaging shows white matter tracts between human auditory and visual cortex.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Tina Plank; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Multisensory perceptual learning reshapes both fast and slow mechanisms of crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Melissa A Batson; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Specificity of auditory-guided visual perceptual learning suggests crossmodal plasticity in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes Constantino; Leyla Pinggera; Supathum Paranamana; Makio Kashino; Maria Chait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Emotional valence and spatial congruency differentially modulate crossmodal processing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Dhana Wolf; Lisa Schock; Saurabh Bhavsar; Liliana R Demenescu; Walter Sturm; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.