Literature DB >> 15597385

Mechanical modulation of molecular signals which regulate anabolic and catabolic activity in bone tissue.

Stefan Judex1, Nan Zhong, Maria E Squire, Kenny Ye, Leah-Rae Donahue, Michael Hadjiargyrou, Clinton T Rubin.   

Abstract

Identifying the molecular mechanisms that regulate bone's adaptive response to alterations in load bearing may potentiate the discovery of interventions to curb osteoporosis. Adult female mice (BALB/cByJ) were subjected to catabolic (disuse) and anabolic (45 Hz, 0.3g vibration for 10 min/day) signals, and changes in the mRNA levels of thirteen genes were compared to altered indices of bone formation. Age-matched mice served as controls. Following 4 days of disuse, significant (P = 0.05) decreases in mRNA levels were measured for several genes, including collagen type I (-55%), osteonectin (-44%), osterix (-36%), and MMP-2 (-36%) all of which, after 21 days, had normalized to control levels. In contrast, expression of several genes in the vibrated group, which failed to show significant changes at 4 days, demonstrated significant increases after 21 days, including inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) (39%, P = 0.07), MMP-2 (54%), and receptor activator of the nuclear factor kB ligand (RANKL) (32%). Correlations of gene expression patterns across experimental conditions and time points allowed the functional clustering of responsive genes into two distinct groups. Each cluster's specific regulatory role (formation vs. resorption) was reinforced by the 60% suppression of formation rates caused by disuse, and the 55% increase in formation rates stimulated by mechanical signals (P < 0.05). These data confirm the complexity of the bone remodeling process, both in terms of the number of genes involved, their interaction and coordination of resorptive and formative activity, and the temporal sensitivity of the processes. More detailed spatial and temporal correlations between altered mRNA levels and tissue plasticity may further delineate the molecules responsible for the control of bone mass and morphology. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15597385     DOI: 10.1002/jcb.20363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  21 in total

Review 1.  Molecular pathways mediating mechanical signaling in bone.

Authors:  Janet Rubin; Clinton Rubin; Christopher Rae Jacobs
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Osteocytes as mechanosensors in the inhibition of bone resorption due to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Lidan You; Sara Temiyasathit; Peling Lee; Chi Hyun Kim; Padmaja Tummala; Wei Yao; Wade Kingery; Amanda M Malone; Ronald Y Kwon; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation promotes osteogenesis while preventing dietary-induced obesity.

Authors:  Yen Kim Luu; Encarnacion Capilla; Clifford J Rosen; Vicente Gilsanz; Jeffrey E Pessin; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  The role of nitric oxide in the mechanical repression of RANKL in bone stromal cells.

Authors:  Jill Rahnert; Xian Fan; Natasha Case; Tamara C Murphy; Francesco Grassi; Buer Sen; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Vibration stimuli and the differentiation of musculoskeletal progenitor cells: Review of results in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Jennifer Helen Edwards; Gwendolen Clair Reilly
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Limb Segment Load Inhibits the Recovery of Soleus H-Reflex After Segmental Vibration in Humans.

Authors:  Shih-Chiao Tseng; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Cell Mechanosensitivity to Extremely Low-Magnitude Signals Is Enabled by a LINCed Nucleus.

Authors:  Gunes Uzer; William R Thompson; Buer Sen; Zhihui Xie; Sherwin S Yen; Sean Miller; Guniz Bas; Maya Styner; Clinton T Rubin; Stefan Judex; Keith Burridge; Janet Rubin
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Safety and severity of accelerations delivered from whole body vibration exercise devices to standing adults.

Authors:  Jesse Muir; Douglas P Kiel; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.319

9.  Adipogenesis is inhibited by brief, daily exposure to high-frequency, extremely low-magnitude mechanical signals.

Authors:  C T Rubin; E Capilla; Y K Luu; B Busa; H Crawford; D J Nolan; V Mittal; C J Rosen; J E Pessin; S Judex
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Musculoskeletal response of dystrophic mice to short term, low intensity, high frequency vibration.

Authors:  S A Novotny; M D Eckhoff; B C Eby; J A Call; D Nuckley; D A Lowe
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.