Literature DB >> 23800087

Geographic variation in ambulatory electronic health record adoption: implications for underserved communities.

Jennifer King1, Michael F Furukawa, Melinda B Buntin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe small area variation in ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) adoption and assess evidence of a "digital divide" in whether adoption is lagging in traditionally underserved communities. DATA SOURCES: Survey data on U.S. ambulatory health care sites (261,973 sites representing 716,160 providers) collected by SK&A Information Services in 2011. STUDY
DESIGN: We examined cross-sectional variation in two measures of local area EHR adoption: share of providers at sites using an EHR with e-prescribing functionality; and predicted probability of EHR adoption for the average site. Local areas were defined as Public Use Microdata Areas (n = 2,068). Using multivariate regression, we examined the association between adoption and three area characteristics: high concentration of minority population; high concentration of low-income population; and metropolitan status. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: EHR adoption varied significantly across local areas, ranging from 8 to 88 percent with a median of 41 percent. Adoption was lower in large metropolitan areas; areas with high concentration of minority population in the Northeast and West; and areas with high concentration of low-income population in the Midwest.
CONCLUSIONS: Our 2011 estimates suggest there was substantial room for increased EHR adoption across the United States, including some underserved areas with relatively low EHR adoption rates. Further research should monitor policy initiatives in these areas and examine sources of heterogeneity in low- and high-adoption communities. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Keywords:  Electronic health records; ambulatory care; geographic variation; underserved populations

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23800087      PMCID: PMC3876400          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  43 in total

1.  Assessing the potential of national strategies for electronic health records for population health monitoring and research.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2006-01

2.  Financial incentives, quality improvement programs, and the adoption of clinical information technology.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Lawrence P Casalino; Robin R Gillies; Diane R Rittenhouse; Stephen S Shortell; Sara Fernandes-Taylor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  California's digital divide: clinical information systems for the haves and have-nots.

Authors:  Robert H Miller; Katherine D'Amato; Nancy Oliva; Christopher E West; Joel W Adelson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Collecting and sharing data for population health: a new paradigm.

Authors:  Carol C Diamond; Farzad Mostashari; Clay Shirky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature.

Authors:  Caroline Lubick Goldzweig; Ali Towfigh; Margaret Maglione; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.

Authors:  Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Sowmya R Rao; Karen Donelan; Timothy G Ferris; Ashish Jha; Rainu Kaushal; Douglas E Levy; Sara Rosenbaum; Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians.

Authors:  Maziar Abdolrasulnia; Nir Menachemi; Richard M Shewchuk; Peter M Ginter; W Jack Duncan; Robert G Brooks
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep

8.  Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; Peter Shin; Michael G Leu; Douglas E Levy; Renée Marie Betancourt; Dan Hawkins; Michelle Proser
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Adoption and perceptions of electronic health record systems by ophthalmologists: an American Academy of Ophthalmology survey.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Michael V Boland; James W Margolis; Flora Lum; Michael D Abramoff; P Lloyd Hildebrand
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; David W Bates; Chelsea Jenter; E John Orav; Jie Zheng; Paul Cleary; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.431

View more
  11 in total

1.  Using i2b2 to Bootstrap Rural Health Analytics and Learning Networks.

Authors:  Daniel R Harris; Adam D Baus; Tamela J Harper; Traci D Jarrett; Cecil R Pollard; Jeffery C Talbert
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

2.  Physician Competition in the Era of Accountable Care Organizations.

Authors:  Michael R Richards; Catherine T Smith; Amy J Graves; Melinda B Buntin; Matthew J Resnick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use.

Authors:  Kea Turner; Young-Rock Hong; Sandhya Yadav; Jinhai Huo; Arch G Mainous
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Area-level factors associated with electronic health record adoption and meaningful use in the Regional Extension Center Program.

Authors:  Cleo A Samuel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Physician and Practice-Level Drivers and Disparities around Meaningful Use Progress.

Authors:  Dawn Heisey-Grove; Jennifer A King
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Meaningful Use of the Indian Health Service Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Gina R Kruse; Howard Hays; E John Orav; Martha Palan; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The Influence of the Degree of Rurality on EMR Adoption, by Physician Specialty.

Authors:  Brian E Whitacre
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Informatics-based Challenges of Building Collaborative Healthcare Research and Analysis Networks from Rural Community Health Centers.

Authors:  Daniel R Harris; Tamela J Harper; Darren W Henderson; Keith W Henry; Jeffery C Talbert
Journal:  IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2016-04-21

9.  Effects of Regulation and Payment Policies on Nurse Practitioners' Clinical Practices.

Authors:  Hilary Barnes; Claudia B Maier; Danielle Altares Sarik; Hayley Drew Germack; Linda H Aiken; Matthew D McHugh
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.929

10.  Assessment of Personal Health Care Management and Chronic Disease Prevalence: Comparative Analysis of Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Health-Related Variables.

Authors:  Ryan H Sandefer; Bonnie L Westra; Saif S Khairat; David S Pieczkiewicz; Stuart M Speedie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.