Literature DB >> 23369083

Cancer patient and clinician acceptability and feasibility of a supportive care screening and referral process.

Eli Ristevski1, Melanie Regan, Rebecca Jones, Sibilah Breen, Angela Batson, Matthew R McGrail.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incorporating supportive care into routine cancer care is an increasing priority for the multi-disciplinary team with growing evidence of its importance to patient-centred care. How to design and deliver a process which is appropriate for patients, clinicians and health services in rural areas needs further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To (i) examine the patient and clinician acceptability and feasibility of incorporating a supportive care screening and referral process into routine cancer care in a rural setting, and (ii) explore any potential influences of patient variables on the acceptability of the process.
METHODS: A total of 154 cancer patients and 36 cancer clinicians across two rural areas of Victoria, Australia participated. During treatment visits, patients and clinicians participated in a supportive care process involving screening, discussion of problems, and provision of information and referrals. Structured questionnaires with open and closed questions were used to measure patient and clinician acceptability and feasibility.
RESULTS: Patients and clinicians found the supportive care process highly acceptable. Screening identified relevant patient problems (90%) and problems that may not have otherwise been identified (83%). The patient-clinician discussion helped patients realize help was available (87%) and enhanced clinician-patient rapport (72%). Patients received useful referrals to services (76%). Feasibility issues included timing of screening for newly diagnosed patients, privacy in discussing problems, clinician time and availability of referral options. No patient demographic or disease factors influenced acceptability or feasibility.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients and clinicians reported high acceptability for the supportive care process, although mechanisms for incorporating the process into health care need to be further developed.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; health professional; implementation; patient; regional; supportive care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23369083      PMCID: PMC5060790          DOI: 10.1111/hex.12045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  39 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. Welcome support for GPs.

Authors:  Jane Turner; Brian McAvoy; Karen Luxford; Jane Fletcher
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Creating a culture of compassion: developing supportive care for people with cancer.

Authors:  Alison Richardson
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.398

3.  Oncology nurses' perceptions of their supportive care for parents with advanced cancer: challenges and educational needs.

Authors:  Jane Turner; Alexandra Clavarino; Patsy Yates; Maryanne Hargraves; Veronica Connors; Sue Hausmann
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Patient perceptions of privacy infringements in an emergency department.

Authors:  Jonathan Karro; Andrew W Dent; Stephen Farish
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Patient-health care provider communication during chemotherapy treatment: the perspectives of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  D A Bakker; M I Fitch; R Gray; E Reed; J Bennett
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-04

Review 6.  Signalising psychosocial problems in cancer care :the structural use of a short psychosocial checklist during medical or nursing visits.

Authors:  I P M Kruijver; B Garssen; A P Visser; A J Kuiper
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-08

7.  Screening for distress in lung and breast cancer outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Shannon L Groff; Olga Maciejewski; Barry D Bultz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders-preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Stephen Kaar; Chris Coggan; Joanne Herdman
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  How well do medical oncologists' perceptions reflect their patients' reported physical and psychosocial problems? Data from a survey of five oncologists.

Authors:  S Newell; R W Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Bonaventura
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  9 in total

1.  Indigenous cancer patient and staff attitudes towards unmet needs screening using the SCNAT-IP.

Authors:  G Garvey; B Thewes; V F Y He; E Davis; A Girgis; P C Valery; K Giam; A Hocking; J Jackson; V Jones; D Yip
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Comparison of perceptions of unmet supportive care needs between cancer patients and their oncologists.

Authors:  Satish Chandrasekhar Nair; Waleed A Hassen; Jayadevan Sreedharan; Khaled Qawasmeh; Halah Ibrahim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The Clinical Utility of the Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool (AYA-POST): Perspectives of AYA Cancer Patients and Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Pandora Patterson; Fiona E J McDonald; Kimberley R Allison; Helen Bibby; Michael Osborn; Karen Matthews; Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Kate Thompson; Meg Plaster; Antoinette Anazodo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 4.  Psychosocial Follow-Up in Survivorship as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology.

Authors:  E Anne Lown; Farya Phillips; Lisa A Schwartz; Abby R Rosenberg; Barbara Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Systematic screening and assessment of psychosocial well-being and care needs of people with cancer.

Authors:  Bojoura Schouten; Bert Avau; Geertruida Trudy E Bekkering; Patrick Vankrunkelsven; Jeroen Mebis; Johan Hellings; Ann Van Hecke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

6.  Development and Feasibility Testing of PROMPT-Care, an eHealth System for Collection and Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Afaf Girgis; Geoff P Delaney; Anthony Arnold; Alexis Andrew Miller; Janelle V Levesque; Nasreen Kaadan; Martin G Carolan; Nicole Cook; Kenneth Masters; Thomas T Tran; Tiffany Sandell; Ivana Durcinoska; Martha Gerges; Sandra Avery; Weng Ng; Stephen Della-Fiorentina; Haryana M Dhillon; Ashley Maher
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-11-24

7.  Meeting psychosocial needs to improve health: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Jenny Young; Jan Savinc
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Study protocol for a controlled trial of an eHealth system utilising patient reported outcome measures for personalised treatment and care: PROMPT-Care 2.0.

Authors:  Afaf Girgis; Ivana Durcinoska; Martha Gerges; Nasreen Kaadan; Anthony Arnold; Joseph Descallar; Geoff P Delaney
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.

Authors:  Afaf Girgis; Ivana Durcinoska; Janelle V Levesque; Martha Gerges; Tiffany Sandell; Anthony Arnold; Geoff P Delaney
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.