Literature DB >> 16828665

Signalising psychosocial problems in cancer care :the structural use of a short psychosocial checklist during medical or nursing visits.

I P M Kruijver1, B Garssen, A P Visser, A J Kuiper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this summary of literature, we evaluated 16 studies with respect to recognition and screening for psychosocial problems of cancer patients during nursing or medical visits, and with respect to the effects of providing quality of life information during these visits.
METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted. To obtain the relevant literature, a search was made of two databases: Medline and Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The literature from the last 12 years - from 1993 till 2004 - was selected.
RESULTS: The results show that in a number of studies a gap is demonstrated between the presence of cancer patients' psychosocial problems and health care providers' ability to signalise these problems adequately. The outcomes of these studies further show that the use of a psychosocial checklist is helpful in screening and communicating psychosocial problems, and that supplying information about quality of life facilitates provider-patient communication about these issues.
CONCLUSION: None of the studies, however, provides extensive insight into the feasibility of a psychosocial checklist in daily oncology practice. Implementation projects have to be conducted focussing on conditions that block or facilitate the use of a psychosocial checklist in daily practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: By monitoring blocking and facilitating conditions strictly and, if necessary, by adjusting them, we can create guidelines to make the use of a psychosocial checklist feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828665     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  11 in total

1.  Identifying and predicting subgroups of information needs among cancer patients: an initial study using latent class analysis.

Authors:  Melanie Neumann; Markus Wirtz; Nicole Ernstmann; Oliver Ommen; Alfred Längler; Friedrich Edelhäuser; Christian Scheffer; Diethard Tauschel; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Pain and anxiety during bone marrow aspiration/biopsy: Comparison of ratings among patients versus health-care professionals.

Authors:  Y Lidén; N Olofsson; O Landgren; E Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.398

3.  Meta-analysis of efficacy of interventions for elevated depressive symptoms in adults diagnosed with cancer.

Authors:  Stacey L Hart; Michael A Hoyt; Michael Diefenbach; Derek R Anderson; Kristin M Kilbourn; Lynette L Craft; Jennifer L Steel; Pim Cuijpers; David C Mohr; Mark Berendsen; Bonnie Spring; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Quality of life in women with localised breast cancer or malignant melanoma 2 years after initial treatment: a comparison.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Rebecca Emeny; Dieter Hölzel; Gabriele Schubert-Fritschle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-06

5.  Cancer patient and clinician acceptability and feasibility of a supportive care screening and referral process.

Authors:  Eli Ristevski; Melanie Regan; Rebecca Jones; Sibilah Breen; Angela Batson; Matthew R McGrail
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Clinician-patient communication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gary Rodin; Jean A Mackay; Camilla Zimmermann; Carole Mayer; Doris Howell; Mark Katz; Jonathan Sussman; Melissa Brouwers
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Hope, emotion regulation, and psychosocial well-being in patients newly diagnosed with cancer.

Authors:  Chao Xu Peh; Ee Heok Kua; Rathi Mahendran
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.359

8.  Routine psychosocial distress screening in radiotherapy: implementation and evaluation of a computerised procedure.

Authors:  A Dinkel; P Berg; C Pirker; H Geinitz; S Sehlen; M Emrich; B Marten-Mittag; G Henrich; K Book; P Herschbach
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluation.

Authors:  Anna P B M Braeken; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Daniëlle Eekers; Francis C J M van Gils; Ruud M A Houben; Lilian Lechner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Analysis of psychosocial stress factors in patients with renal cancer.

Authors:  Désirée Louise Draeger; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Oliver W Hakenberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.