Literature DB >> 23368713

Colony life history and lifetime reproductive success of red harvester ant colonies.

Krista K Ingram1, Anna Pilko, Jeffrey Heer, Deborah M Gordon.   

Abstract

1. We estimate colony reproductive success, in numbers of offspring colonies arising from a colony's daughter queens, of colonies of the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. 2. A measure of lifetime reproductive success is essential to understand the relation of ecological factors, phenotype and fitness in a natural population. This was possible for the first time in a natural population of ant colonies using data from long-term study of a population of colonies in south-eastern Arizona, for which ages of all colonies are known from census data collected since 1985. 3. Parentage analyses of microsatellite data from 5 highly polymorphic loci were used to assign offspring colonies to maternal parent colonies in a population of about 265 colonies, ages 1-28 years, sampled in 2010. 4. The estimated population growth rate Ro was 1.69 and generation time was 7.8 years. There was considerable variation among colonies in reproductive success: of 199 possible parent colonies, only 49 (˜ 25%) had offspring colonies on the site. The mean number of offspring colonies per maternal parent colony was 2.94 and ranged from 1 to 8. A parent was identified for the queen of 146 of 247 offspring colonies. There was no evidence for reproductive senescence; fecundity was about the same throughout the 25-30 year lifespan of a colony. 5. There were no trends in the distance or direction of the dispersal of an offspring relative to its maternal parent colony. There was no relationship between the number of gynes produced by a colony in 1 year and the number of offspring colonies subsequently founded by its daughter reproductive females. The results provide the first estimate of a life table for a population of ant colonies and the first estimate of the female component of colony lifetime reproductive success. 6. The results suggest that commonly used measures of reproductive output may not be correlated with realized reproductive success. This is the starting point for future investigation asking whether variation in reproductive success is related to phenotypic variation among colonies in behavioural and ecological traits.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ant colony population; demography; microsatellites; parentage analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23368713     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  16 in total

1.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of thermal tolerance and its fitness consequences: parallel and non-parallel responses to urban heat islands across three cities.

Authors:  Sarah E Diamond; Lacy D Chick; Abe Perez; Stephanie A Strickler; Ryan A Martin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The rewards of restraint in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ant colonies.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt; Charles J Goodnight
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Effect of Interactions between Harvester Ants on Forager Decisions.

Authors:  Jacob D Davidson; Roxana P Arauco-Aliaga; Sam Crow; Deborah M Gordon; Mark S Goldman
Journal:  Front Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-05

6.  Measurement of natural variation of neurotransmitter tissue content in red harvester ant brains among different colonies.

Authors:  Mimi Shin; Daniel A Friedman; Deborah M Gordon; B Jill Venton
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Ant cuticular hydrocarbons are heritable and associated with variation in colony productivity.

Authors:  Justin Walsh; Luigi Pontieri; Patrizia d'Ettorre; Timothy A Linksvayer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  From division of labor to the collective behavior of social insects.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Harvester ant colony variation in foraging activity and response to humidity.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon; Katherine N Dektar; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Does an ecological advantage produce the asymmetric lineage ratio in a harvester ant population?

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon; Anna Pilko; Nicolas De Bortoli; Krista K Ingram
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.