Literature DB >> 28758093

Effect of Interactions between Harvester Ants on Forager Decisions.

Jacob D Davidson1, Roxana P Arauco-Aliaga2, Sam Crow3, Deborah M Gordon2, Mark S Goldman1,4,5.   

Abstract

Harvester ant colonies adjust their foraging activity to day-to-day changes in food availability and hour-to-hour changes in environmental conditions. This collective behavior is regulated through interactions, in the form of brief antennal contacts, between outgoing foragers and returning foragers with food. Here we consider how an ant, waiting in the entrance chamber just inside the nest entrance, uses its accumulated experience of interactions to decide whether to leave the nest to forage. Using videos of field observations, we tracked the interactions and foraging decisions of ants in the entrance chamber. Outgoing foragers tended to interact with returning foragers at higher rates than ants that returned to the deeper nest and did not forage. To provide a mechanistic framework for interpreting these results, we develop a decision model in which ants make decisions based upon a noisy accumulation of individual contacts with returning foragers. The model can reproduce core trends and realistic distributions for individual ant interaction statistics, and suggests possible mechanisms by which foraging activity may be regulated at an individual ant level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collective behavior; decision-making; integrator; sequential sampling model; stochastic accumulator

Year:  2016        PMID: 28758093      PMCID: PMC5531068          DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2296-701X


  43 in total

1.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  How patrollers set foraging direction in harvester ants.

Authors:  Michael J Greene; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Collective cognition in animal groups.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Recruitment pheromone in the harvester ant genus Pogonomyrmex.

Authors:  B Hölldobler; E D Morgan; N J Oldham; J Liebig
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Desert ants achieve reliable recruitment across noisy interactions.

Authors:  Nitzan Razin; Jean-Pierre Eckmann; Ofer Feinerman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The regulation of foraging activity in red harvester ant colonies.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.

Authors:  Bingni W Brunton; Matthew M Botvinick; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  FoxP influences the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision in Drosophila.

Authors:  Shamik DasGupta; Clara Howcroft Ferreira; Gero Miesenböck
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task.

Authors:  Timothy D Hanks; Jochen Ditterich; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-09       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.

Authors:  Darren Pais; Patrick M Hogan; Thomas Schlegel; Nigel R Franks; Naomi E Leonard; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Spatial organization and interactions of harvester ants during foraging activity.

Authors:  Jacob D Davidson; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Measuring collective behavior: an ecological approach.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.919

3.  Social interactions promote adaptive resource defense in ants.

Authors:  Christoph Johannes Kleineidam; Eva Linda Heeb; Stefanie Neupert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Regulation of harvester ant foraging as a closed-loop excitable system.

Authors:  Renato Pagliara; Deborah M Gordon; Naomi Ehrich Leonard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Distributed Adaptive Search in T Cells: Lessons From Ants.

Authors:  Melanie E Moses; Judy L Cannon; Deborah M Gordon; Stephanie Forrest
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  The physiology of forager hydration and variation among harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) colonies in collective foraging behavior.

Authors:  Daniel A Friedman; Michael J Greene; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Gene expression variation in the brains of harvester ant foragers is associated with collective behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Ari Friedman; Ryan Alexander York; Austin Travis Hilliard; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-03-05

8.  Active Inferants: An Active Inference Framework for Ant Colony Behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Ari Friedman; Alec Tschantz; Maxwell J D Ramstead; Karl Friston; Axel Constant
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  The Role of Dopamine in the Collective Regulation of Foraging in Harvester Ants.

Authors:  Daniel A Friedman; Anna Pilko; Dorota Skowronska-Krawczyk; Karolina Krasinska; Jacqueline W Parker; Jay Hirsh; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-09-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.