| Literature DB >> 23365617 |
Wei He1, Peng Ran, Zheng Xu, Bing Li, Song-nong Li.
Abstract
As the researches of electric impedance tomography (EIT) applications in medical examinations deepen, we attempt to produce the visualization of 3D images of human bladder. In this paper, a planar electrode array system will be introduced as the measuring platform and a series of feasible methods are proposed to evaluate the simulated volume of bladder to avoid overfilling. The combined regularization algorithm enhances the spatial resolution and presents distinguishable sketch of disturbances from the background, which provides us with reliable data from inverse problem to carry on to the three-dimensional reconstruction. By detecting the edge elements and tracking down the lost information, we extract quantitative morphological features of the object from the noises and background. Preliminary measurements were conducted and the results showed that the proposed algorithm overcomes the defects of holes, protrusions, and debris in reconstruction. In addition, the targets' location in space and roughly volume could be calculated according to the grid of finite element of the model, and this feature was never achievable for the previous 2D imaging.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23365617 PMCID: PMC3546496 DOI: 10.1155/2012/528096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1(a) System measurement, (b) Electrodes arrangement, and (c) Experimental Prototype.
Typical condition number of Jacobian matrix and regularization algorithms.
| Jacobian matrix | Tikhonov regularization | NOSER regularization | Combined regularization | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition number | 1.536 × 1016 | 1.109 × 1011 | 3.854 × 109 | 9.294 × 108 |
Figure 2(a) Tetrahedral finite elements, (b) Electrical impedance slices by solving the inverse problem.
Figure 3Extracted edge elements from tetrahedron slice.
Figure 4
Figure 5Experiment models and the corresponding 2D images.
Figure 63D reconstructions from different volumes of saline solution.
Figure 7(a) Volume comparison of models and (b) Relative position errors.